J Stroke Search

CLOSE


J Stroke > Volume 27(2); 2025 > Article
Koga, Branca, Strbian, Yoshimoto, Tanaka, Yoshimura, Yakushiji, Fujimoto, Vedamurthy, Krishnan, Tiainen, Vehoff, Sibolt, Matsuzono, Kulyk, Räty, Slade, Salerno, Hemelsoet, Horvath, Kunieda, Nakajima, Akiyama, Iguchi, Inoue, Ihara, Toyoda, Seiffge, Goeldlin, Dawson, and Fischer: Impact of Stroke Severity and Vascular Risk Factors on Early Versus Late Anticoagulation in Patients With Stroke and Atrial Fibrillation
Dear Sir:
Patients with acute ischemic stroke and atrial fibrillation (AF) have a high risk of recurrent stroke [1]. In addition, the initiation of secondary prevention with anticoagulants increases the risk of bleeding events [1,2]. This risk may be particularly high in patients who have experienced more severe strokes and those with vascular risk factors, such as diabetes, hypertension, or previous stroke [3,4]. Although early initiation of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) is non-inferior to delayed initiation in preventing recurrent stroke, bleeding events, and death in patients with AF-related ischemic stroke [5-7], whether this holds true for patients with severe stroke and additional vascular risk factors remains unclear.
Herein, we explored whether clinical stroke severity and vascular risk factors affect the incidence of ischemic and bleeding events in patients with ischemic stroke and AF. Additionally, we assessed whether stroke severity and vascular risk factors modify the treatment effect of early versus late DOAC initiation. This study comprised a post hoc analysis of data from the Early versus Late Initiation of Direct Oral Anticoagulants in Post-ischemic Stroke Patients With Atrial Fibrillation (ELAN) trial (ClinicalTrials. gov identifier: NCT03148457), which enrolled randomized participants with acute ischemic stroke and AF to early (within 48 h of a minor/moderate stroke or 6-7 days following a major stroke) versus late (day 3-4 following a minor, day 6-7 following a moderate, or day 12-14 following a major stroke) DOAC initiation [5]. The study protocol and information on data collection have been published previously [8]. Details of participants, randomization methods, vascular risk factors, outcomes, and statistical analysis are described in the Supplementary Methods. The primary outcome was a composite of recurrent ischemic stroke, systemic embolism, major extracranial bleeding, symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH), or vascular death within 30 days of randomization (binary). Secondary outcomes included the same composite outcome within 90 days (binary) and bleeding events (composite of major extracranial bleeding and sICH). The ethics board of each participating hospital approved this study. Prior to enrollment, local investigators sought consent from each participant, next-of-kin/legal representative, or an independent physician, in accordance with local regulations.
Primary outcome events occurred in 29 (2.9%) and 41 (4.1%) participants in the early and late DOAC initiation groups, respectively. Supplementary Table 1 presents the baseline characteristics of all participants, as well as those randomized to early or late DOAC initiation groups. Vascular risk factors were well balanced between the groups. In univariate analysis, geographical region, history of ischemic events, vascular disease, chronic heart failure (New York Heart Association Classification), creatinine clearance, CHA2DS2-VASc score, pre-stroke modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score, and severe stroke (defined as a National Institute of Health Stroke Scale score of 10 or more) were associated with the primary outcome (at 30 days) or composite outcome at 90 days (Supplementary Table 2). Chronic heart failure and severe stroke were associated with both recurrent stroke and systemic embolism within 30 and 90 days. Severe stroke was associated with the risk of bleeding and major extracranial bleeding events. Full details of the univariate associations with all secondary outcomes are provided in Supplementary Tables 3 and 4.
Table 1 and Supplementary Table 5 present the results of multivariable analysis of the primary and secondary outcomes. No multivariable model was constructed for bleeding events within 30 days or for sICH within 30 or 90 days because of the absence of any univariate associations. In the adjusted model, chronic heart failure (adjusted odds ratio [OR], 2.49; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.27-4.90) and severe stroke (adjusted OR, 3.33; 95% CI, 2.02-5.49) were associated with the primary outcome. In addition, early DOAC initiation, a diastolic blood pressure (BP) ≥79 mm Hg, and creatinine clearance ≥70 mL/min were associated with the composite outcome within 90 days. No significant risk factors were associated with bleeding events within 90 days. Severe stroke was associated with major extracranial bleeding within 30, but not 90, days. Chronic heart failure and severe stroke were associated with both recurrent ischemic stroke within 30 and that within 90 days. Diastolic BP was associated with recurrent ischemic stroke within 90 days. Age, sex, vascular disease, diabetes, creatinine clearance, pre-stroke mRS score, and severe stroke were negatively associated with an mRS of 0-2 and positively associated with death within 90 days.
No evidence of any treatment interaction was observed between the risk factors and the impact of the randomized treatment on either of the composite outcomes at 30 or 90 days, except for body weight (Figures 1 and 2). The primary outcome (within 30 days) and composite outcome within 90 days were lower with early DOAC initiation compared with late DOAC initiation in participants with body weight <75 kg, and comparable in those with body weight ≥75 kg. The OR of bleeding events at 90 days for each dichotomized risk factor subgroup, as well as the interaction, are presented in forest plots in Supplementary Figure 2.
The main findings were as follows: chronic heart failure and severe stroke were associated with the composite outcome of recurrent ischemic stroke, systemic embolism, major extracranial bleeding, sICH, and vascular death at 30 and 90 days. Neither stroke severity nor vascular risk factors were associated with sICH, but severe stroke (National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale [NIHSS] score ≥10) was associated with major extracranial bleeding within 30 days. Severe stroke is also known to be associated with gastrointestinal bleeding [9]. Except for body weight, we saw no clear evidence of any interaction between stroke severity or vascular risk factors and the treatment effect of early versus late initiation of DOAC in people with AF-related ischemic stroke. However, owing to the low number of events, there was substantial imprecision in our estimates, as evidenced by the wide 95% CIs; further, we did not adjust for multiple comparisons, introducing a risk of both Type 1 and 2 errors. Further, there were a low number of bleeding events in our study, meaning that clinically important relationships could have been missed. In addition, this was a post hoc analysis; therefore, the results should be interpreted with caution, and external validation is needed. Nevertheless, several of these findings warrant further investigation.
Notably, we found that individuals with chronic heart failure and severe stroke have an increased risk of a composite of ischemic and bleeding events, and death within 90 days. Except for body weight, there appears to be no evidence of effect modification by stroke severity or vascular risk factors on ischemic events, bleeding events, or death following early DOAC initiation after AF-related ischemic stroke. Therefore, the findings of the ELAN trial are applicable to a wide range of patients with AF-related stroke. However, careful monitoring of major extracranial bleeding within 30 days is necessary in patients with severe stroke, regardless of the timing of DOAC initiation.

Supplementary materials

Supplementary materials related to this article can be found online at https://doi.org/10.5853/jos.2024.05477.
Supplementary Table 1.
Baseline characteristics by potential risk factors
jos-2024-05477-Supplementary-Table-1.pdf
Supplementary Table 2.
Univariate analysis for effect of potential risk factors on primary outcome (composite outcome at 30 days) and composite outcome at 90 days
jos-2024-05477-Supplementary-Table-2.pdf
Supplementary Table 3.
Univariate analysis for effect of potential risk factors on secondary outcomes within 30 days
jos-2024-05477-Supplementary-Table-3.pdf
Supplementary Table 4.
Univariate analysis for effect of potential risk factors on secondary outcomes within 90 days
jos-2024-05477-Supplementary-Table-4.pdf
Supplementary Table 5.
Univariate analysis for effect of potential risk factors on secondary outcomes except the composite outcome at 90 days
jos-2024-05477-Supplementary-Table-5.pdf
Supplementary Figure 1.
Patient flowchart. One participant had an event within 30 days and later withdrew consent without attending the 30-day followup appointment. One participant who died within 30 days had previously had an event adjudicated as primary outcome. GCP, good clinical practice.
jos-2024-05477-Supplementary-Fig-1.pdf
Supplementary Figure 2.
Forest plot representing the OR with 95% CI comparing early versus late DOAC initiation for bleeding events at 90 days by dichotomized/ binary risk factors and the interaction between the timing of DOAC initiation and risk factors. DOAC, direct oral anticoagulant; mRS, modified Rankin Scale; MI, myocardial infarction; BP, blood pressure; NIHSS, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale; OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval.
jos-2024-05477-Supplementary-Fig-2.pdf

Notes

Funding statement
The ELAN trial was supported by grants from the Swiss National Science Foundation (32003 B _197009; 32003 B _169975), Swiss Heart Foundation, Stroke Association, UK (2017/02), and the Intramural Research Fund (20-4-5) for Cardiovascular Diseases of the National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center, Japan. MG received a protected research time grant from the Swiss Academy of Medical Sciences/Bangerter-Rhyner Foundation for the present study (YTCR_13/18).
Conflicts of interest
MK: honoraria from Bayer Yakuhin, Daiichi Sankyo, Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Corporation, BMS/Pfizer, BMS/Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Otsuka Pharmaceutical, and AstraZeneca; research support from Daiichi Sankyo and Nippon Boehringer Ingelheim, all outside of the submitted work. MB is affiliated with CTU Bern, the University of Bern, which has a staff policy of not accepting honoraria or consultancy fees. However, CTU Bern was involved in the design, conduct, and analysis of clinical studies funded by non-profit and for-profit organizations. Pharmaceutical and medical device companies have provided direct funding for some of these studies. For an updated list of CTU Bern’s conflicts of interest, see: https://dcr.unibe.ch/services/declaration_of_interest/index_eng.html. DS: Advisory board participation for AstraZeneca and unrestricted educational grant from Boehringer Ingelheim. TY: honoraria from Takeda Pharmaceutical, Nippon Boehringer Ingelheim, Daiichi Sankyo, Stryker, and Tonbridge Medical. MN: honoraria from Bayer, Pfizer, Daiichi Sankyo, Japan Blood Products Organization, Otsuka Pharmaceutical, Stryker, Medtronic, Biogen, Eizai, Kowa, Takeda, and Abbot Medical; research support from Daiichi Sankyo and Otsuka Pharmaceutical, all outside of the submitted work. JD: Speaker fees: Pfizer, BMS, Boehringer Ingelheim, Daiichi Sankyo, Medtronic, and Bayer. Research funding from Pfizer, BMS, and the Stroke Association. UF: Received research support from the Swiss National Science Foundation and the Swiss Heart Foundation; PI of the ELAN trial, Co-PI of the DISTAL, TECNO, SWIFT DIRECT and SWITCH trials; research grants from Medtronic (BEYOND SWIFT, SWIFT DIRECT) and from Stryker, Rapid medical, Penumbra and Phenox (DISTAL); consultancies for Medtronic, Stryker, and CSL Behring (fees paid to institution); participated on an advisory board for Alexion/Portola, Boehringer Ingelheim, Biogen and Acthera (fees paid to institution); member of a clinical event committee of the COATING study (Phenox) and member of the data and safety monitoring committee (DSMB) of the TITAN, LATE_MT and IN EXTREMIS trials; president of the Swiss Neurological Society.
The remaining authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.
Author contribution
Conceptualization: MK, JD, UF. Study design: MK. Methodology: MK, JD, UF. Data collection: MK, DS, TY, KT, SY, YY, SF, AV, MaKr, MT, JV, GS, KM, CK, SR, PS, AS, DH, TH, TK, MN, HA, YI, MI, MaIh, KaTo, DaSe, MG, JD, UF. Investigation: MK, JD, UF. Statistical analysis: MB. Writing—original draft: MK. Writing— review & editing: all authors. Funding acquisition: MK, UF. Approval of final manuscript: all authors.
Acknowledgments
We would like to thank Susan Kaplan for proofreading the manuscript. The list of ELAN Collaborators is provided in the Appendix.

Figure 1.
Forest plot showing the OR with 95% CI for the comparison of early versus late DOAC initiation for the composite outcome at 30 days by dichotomized/ binary risk factors, and the interaction between the timing of DOAC initiation and risk factors. DOAC, direct oral anticoagulant; mRS, modified Rankin Scale; MI, myocardial infarction; BP, blood pressure; NIHSS, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale; OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval.
jos-2024-05477f1.jpg
Figure 2.
Forest plot showing the OR with 95% CI comparing early versus late DOAC initiation for the composite outcome at 90 days by dichotomized/binary risk factors, and the interaction between the timing of DOAC initiation and risk factors. DOAC, direct oral anticoagulant; mRS, modified Rankin Scale; MI, myocardial infarction; BP, blood pressure; NIHSS, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale; OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval.
jos-2024-05477f2.jpg
Table 1.
Multivariable analysis of the effect of potential risk factors on primary outcome (at 30 days) and main secondary outcome (composite outcome at 90 days)
Risk factors Adjusted OR (95% CI)
Primary outcome Composite outcome at 90 days
Randomization group (early vs. late) 0.65 (0.43-0.99)
Age (≥70 vs. <70 yr) 1.03 (0.47-2.28) 1.11 (0.54-2.29)
Sex (female vs. male)
Weight (≥75 vs. <75 kg) 0.99 (0.62-1.58)
Region (Western/Central Europe vs. others) 0.82 (0.46-1.48) 1.15 (0.64-2.05)
History of ischemic stroke, TIA, or systemic embolism (yes vs. no) 1.28 (0.73-2.22) 1.25 (0.76-2.04)
History of myocardial infarction (yes vs. no)
Vascular disease (yes vs. no) 1.48 (0.86-2.54)
Chronic heart failure (yes vs. no) 2.49 (1.27-4.90) 2.41 (1.30-4.47)
Hypertension (yes vs. no)
Systolic blood pressure (≥138 vs. <138 mm Hg)
Diastolic blood pressure (≥79 vs. <79 mm Hg) 1.66 (1.06-2.59)
Diabetes (yes vs. no) 1.24 (0.69-2.21) 1.18 (0.69-2.03)
Dyslipidemia (yes vs. no)
Creatinine clearance (≥70 vs. <70 mL/min) 0.69 (0.41-1.15) 0.59 (0.37-0.94)
CHA2DS2-VASc score (≥5 vs. <5) 1.26 (0.61-2.57) 1.40 (0.73-2.68)
Current/past smoker (yes vs. no)
Pre-stroke mRS (0-2 vs. 3-5) 0.88 (0.49-1.61)
NIHSS at randomization (≥10 vs. <10) 3.33 (2.02-5.49) 3.22 (2.01-5.15)
The comparison is between the first item in parentheses and the second (reference) item (e.g., OR of females compared to males). Missing data included history of TIA or systemic embolism (0.9%), history of myocardial infarction (1%), vascular disease (3.5%), heart failure (6.8%), hypertension (0.9%), diabetes (0.7%), dyslipidaemia (2.9%), smoking (5.6%), NIHSS at admission (2.4%). Blank cells indicated that there were no risk factors with a P-value of <0.1 in univariate analysis.
TIA, transient ischemic attack; mRS, modified Rankin Scale; NIHSS, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale; OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval.

References

1. Paciaroni M, Agnelli G, Falocci N, Caso V, Becattini C, Marcheselli S, et al. Early recurrence and cerebral bleeding in patients with acute ischemic stroke and atrial fibrillation: effect of anticoagulation and its timing: the RAF study. Stroke 2015;46:2175-2182.
pmid
2. Paciaroni M, Agnelli G, Micheli S, Caso V. Efficacy and safety of anticoagulant treatment in acute cardioembolic stroke: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Stroke 2007;38:423-430.
crossref pmid
3. Pisters R, Lane DA, Nieuwlaat R, de Vos CB, Crijns HJ, Lip GY. A novel user-friendly score (HAS-BLED) to assess 1-year risk of major bleeding in patients with atrial fibrillation: the Euro Heart Survey. Chest 2010;138:1093-1100.
crossref pmid
4. Saposnik G, Fang J, Kapral MK, Tu JV, Mamdani M, Austin P, et al. The iScore predicts effectiveness of thrombolytic therapy for acute ischemic stroke. Stroke 2012;43:1315-1322.
crossref pmid
5. Fischer U, Koga M, Strbian D, Branca M, Abend S, Trelle S, et al. Early versus later anticoagulation for stroke with atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med 2023;388:2411-2421.
pmid
6. Oldgren J, Åsberg S, Hijazi Z, Wester P, Bertilsson M, Norrving B, et al. Early versus delayed non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant therapy after acute ischemic stroke in atrial fibrillation (TIMING): a registry-based randomized controlled noninferiority study. Circulation 2022;146:1056-1066.
crossref pmid pmc
7. Werring DJ, Dehbi HM, Ahmed N, Arram L, Best JG, Balogun M, et al. Optimal timing of anticoagulation after acute ischaemic stroke with atrial fibrillation (OPTIMAS): a multicentre, blinded-endpoint, phase 4, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2024;404:1731-1741.

8. Fischer U, Trelle S, Branca M, Salanti G, Paciaroni M, Ferrari C, et al. Early versus Late initiation of direct oral Anticoagulants in post-ischaemic stroke patients with atrial fibrillatioN (ELAN): protocol for an international, multicentre, randomised-controlled, two-arm, open, assessor-blinded trial. Eur Stroke J 2022;7:487-495.
pmid pmc
9. Ogata T, Kamouchi M, Matsuo R, Hata J, Kuroda J, Ago T, et al. Gastrointestinal bleeding in acute ischemic stroke: recent trends from the fukuoka stroke registry. Cerebrovasc Dis Extra 2014;4:156-164.
crossref pmid pmc pdf

Appendices

Appendix.

ELAN Collaborators

jos-2024-05477-Appendix-1.pdf


ABOUT JoS
AUTHOR INFORMATION
ARTICLE CATEGORY

Browse all articles >

BROWSE ARTICLES
Editorial Office
Department of Neurology, Asan Medical Center,Ulsan University College of Medicine
88, Olympic-ro 43-gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul 05505, Korea
Submission, status and progress, etc ⟫ E-mail: editor@j-stroke.org
Website and system ⟫ E-mail: journal@m2community.co.kr
Publishing company ⟫ E-mail: ka72sus@smileml.com
Developed in M2PI
Copyright © 2025 by Korean Stroke Society.
Close layer
prev next