J Stroke Search


J Stroke > Volume 26(1); 2024 > Article
Wang, Liu, Yue, Liu, and Fu: Cerebral Amyloid Angiopathy: An Undeniable Small Vessel Disease
This article has been corrected. See "Cerebral Amyloid Angiopathy: An Undeniable Small Vessel Disease" in Volume 26 on page 347.


Cerebral amyloid angiopathy (CAA) has been proven to be the most common pathological change in cerebral small vessel disease except arteriosclerosis. In recent years, with the discovery of imaging technology and new imaging markers, the diagnostic rate of CAA has greatly improved. CAA plays an important role in non-hypertensive cerebral hemorrhage and cognitive decline. This review comprehensively describes the etiology, epidemiology, pathophysiological mechanisms, clinical features, imaging manifestations, imaging markers, diagnostic criteria, and treatment of CAA to facilitate its diagnosis and treatment and reduce mortality.


Cerebral small vessel disease (CSVD) is a series of clinical, imaging, and pathological changes caused by various cerebrovascular diseases. The most common pathological changes in CSVD include arteriosclerosis and cerebral amyloid angiopathy (CAA). In recent years, with improvements in imaging technologies and the discovery of new imaging markers, the diagnostic rate of CAA has significantly improved. CAA is a cerebrovascular disease characterized by the deposition of amyloid β (Aβ) in the vascular walls of the intracranial microvessels. Neuropathological examination has shown that Aβ is mainly deposited in the cerebral and cerebellar meningeal arterial walls and cerebral cortical arteriolar walls. Other regions, such as the cerebellar cortex, thalamus, and brainstem, may also be involved [1].
CAA is an important risk factor for spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) and is closely associated with age-related cognitive impairment [2]. To date, the pathogenesis of CAA remains unclear despite extensive in vivo and in vitro research, and related treatment methods are still in the exploratory stage. Based on the latest research worldwide, this review describes the etiology, epidemiology, pathophysiological mechanisms, clinical characteristics, imaging manifestations, imaging markers, diagnostic criteria, and treatment of CAA to provide a new direction for the clinical prevention and treatment of CAA.

Etiology and epidemiology of CAA

CAA is very common in the older population and its prevalence increases with age. A longitudinal clinical and pathological study on aging indicated CAA-related pathological changes in nearly 80% of older individuals (the average age of death was 88.5±6.6 years) [3]. Autopsy studies on elderly people in the community have confirmed that about one-third of the elderly have the same neuropathological changes as CAA, and moderate to severe pathological changes are considered to be closely related to cognitive changes in patients [4]. These studies show that CAA is closely associated with age and AD.
CAA comprises three main types: hereditary, sporadic, and iatrogenic (also known as acquired); among these sporadic CAA (sCAA) is the most common, whereas iatrogenic is a newly discovered type [5,6]. Hereditary CAA mainly includes Dutch-type hereditary cerebral hemorrhage with amyloidosis (HCHWA-D), Icelandic patients with hereditary cerebral hemorrhage with amyloidosis (HCHWA-I), and Italian-type CAA [7]. HCHWA-D is an autosomal dominant genetic disease caused by a point mutation in the β amyloid precursor protein (APP) gene on chromosome 21 [7]. This mutation leads to amino acid substitution at codon 693 (E22Q), which leads to changes in Aβ cleavage and secretion, enhanced aggregation characteristics, enhanced proteolysis resistance, decreased affinity of brain efflux transporters, and enhanced cell surface binding, ultimately affecting cell homeostasis [8,9]. HCHWA-I is caused by point mutations in cystatin C [10,11].
Sex may also play a key role in CAA progression. A study of patients with HCHWA-D and sCAA found that male sex and sCAA may be related to an earlier onset and longer course of CAA [12].

Pathophysiological mechanisms underlying CAA

Imbalance between Aβ production and elimination

Aβ is a peptide composed of 36-43 amino acids, which is produced by β and γ secretase-mediated APP cleavage. Aβ plays an important role in the occurrence and development of CAA and AD, both of which are associated with similar pathogenic pathways, namely Aβ production, metabolism, perivascular drainage and clearance, and deposition in the periarterial drainage pathway. However, there are many differences between the two. Regarding Aβ deposition, Aβ in CAA is deposited in the cortex and pia mater (mainly arteries, arterioles, capillaries, and veins) vascular walls, whereas in AD, Aβ is mainly deposited in the brain parenchyma [13]. At the molecular level, Aβ40 is mainly associated with CAA, whereas Aβ42 is associated with AD [14,15]. According to the deposition site of Aβ, CAA can be categorized as CAA type 1 (also known as capillary CAA), which is associated with the apolipoprotein E (APOE) ε4 allele, and CAA type 2, which is associated with the APOE ε2 allele [16]. In CAA type 1, Aβ is mainly deposited in cortical capillaries, whereas in CAA type 2, Aβ is commonly found in the pia mater and cortical arteries, arterioles, and veins [7]. Aβ deposition in blood vessels is mainly divided into three stages: in the first stage, Aβ is mainly deposited in cortical and pia mater vessels in the neocortical area; in the second stage, Aβ deposition spreads to the cortex and cerebellum; and in the third stage, Aβ deposition spreads to the basal ganglia, diencephalon, brain stem, and/or white matter [17]. Under normal physiological conditions, soluble Aβ is removed by various clearance systems. However, this balance is compromised in some pathological conditions, leading to abnormal deposition of Aβ in the basement membrane of some small vessels, thus promoting the occurrence and progression of small vessel diseases such as CAA.
In addition, studies have shown that perivascular spaces (PVSs), mainly located in perforating cortical arterioles, are closely related to CAA severity [18]. Moreover, the destruction of vascular structure and function resulting from Aβ deposition slows down the clearance rate of Aβ, forming a vicious circle of clearing obstacles (Figure 1).

APOE mutation

Apolipoproteins in the brain tissue are mainly produced in neurons, astrocytes, and microglia, which can bind to Aβ and other plasma proteins and lipids and be excreted through PVSs and the basement membrane. APOE is a long-chain protein composed of 299 amino acids that is mainly synthesized in the liver, brain, and kidneys [19]. It transports lipoproteins, liposoluble vitamins, and cholesterol to the lymphatic system and blood. APOE primarily consists of three alleles: ε2, ε3, and ε4, which encode the three main subtypes of APOE proteins: APOE2, APOE3, and APOE4, respectively [20]. Compared with ε2 and ε3, APOE ε4 promotes the diffusion and aggregation of Aβ into oligomers and fibrils, affects Aβ clearance, and enhances amyloid plaque formation and deposition with Aβ as the core, ultimately affecting CAA occurrence and progression [21]. Large-scale clinical evidence has shown a close relationship between APOE status and CAA-related ICH. A meta-analysis evidence showed a dose-dependent association of APOE ε4 with sCAA occurrence [22].
APOE has also been identified as a major genetic risk factor for cognitive decline and delayed AD. Most studies have shown that APOE ε4 is associated with pathology including AD and CAA. Compared with ε4 carriers, the incidence of CAA in ε2 carriers is significantly higher, while AD-related pathological changes are fewer [23].

CAA-related inflammation

CAA-related inflammation (CAA-ri) is a rare type of CAA, which refers to an inflammatory reaction of mononuclear macrophages or lymphocytes in or around the walls of Aβ-deposited cortex and leptomeningeal vessels, is accompanied by multiple microinfarcts and hemosiderin deposition and is also known as Aβ-associated vasculitis. The pathological subtypes of CAA-ri include inflammatory CAA (ICAA) and Aβ-related angiitis (ABRA) [24,25]. Presently, the specific pathogenesis of CAA-ri is unclear, which may be related to the autoimmune inflammatory reaction caused by the abnormal deposition of Aβ amyloid protein.
The clinical manifestations of CAA-ri mainly include subacute neurobehavioral symptoms, headaches, seizures, and stroke-like signs, in sharp contrast to the acute onset of ICH commonly observed in CAA [26]. Focal neurological dysfunction was the most common symptom of CAA-ri (76%), followed by cognitive decline (46%) and headache (34%) [27]. But unlike ICAA, more than half of the patients with ABRA showed changes in mental state (59%), 35% had headache as the primary symptom, and 12% had hallucinations [28]. The risk factors for CAA-ri may include age and the APOE ε4/ε4 genotype, and the latter is closely associated with vasculitis or perivascular inflammation [26,29]. Renard et al. [30] found that approximately 71%-77% of patients with CAA-ri carried the APOE ε4/ε4 gene in contrast to 4%-5% of patients with CAA.
A recent study showed that, compared to other non-inflammatory CAA, CAA-ri has a higher amyloid load and more cerebral microbleeds (CMBs). Untreated CAA-ri can lead to more serious disease, worse clinical outcomes, and more severe loss of autonomic function [26]. Different from simple CAA and other diseases that need differential diagnosis, including central nervous system infection and tumor, CAA-ri responds favorably to immunosuppressive therapy; hence, early diagnosis and active treatment are particularly important. Corticosteroids or immunosuppressants are mainly used to treat CAA-ri and can significantly improve the clinical symptoms of some patients.

Other factors

Some studies have shown that other factors play important roles in the occurrence and development of CAA. High levels of β-site APP-cleaving enzyme 1 in endothelial cells can damage the integrity of tight junctions and cause endothelial dysfunction, which further leads to vascular hypoperfusion, blood-brain barrier leakage, microhemorrhage, microvascular degeneration, and neuronal dysfunction, thus aggravating the development and evolution of CAA [31]. In addition, endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS) has been confirmed to play a key role in accelerating the clearance of Aβ and inhibiting its production, thus reducing the deposition of Aβ in cerebral microvessel walls, while simultaneously promoting vasodilation and preventing the increase in cerebral blood pressure, thus reducing cerebral microhemorrhage [31-33]. A compromise in this balance leads to Aβ deposition, elevated blood pressure, and cerebral microhemorrhage, further promoting CAA and AD progression. Moreover, some risk factors related to AD pathogenesis have been identified in patients with CAA, including presenilin, enkephalinase, and zinc ions, and their roles in the pathogenesis of CAA are also being studied.

Clinical characteristics of CAA

The main clinical manifestations of CAA include spontaneous lobar hemorrhage, cognitive impairment, and dementia (after cerebral hemorrhage or in non-stroke patients), as well as transient focal neurological episodes (TFNEs), often associated with acute convex subarachnoid hemorrhage (cSAH) or superficial cortical iron deposition [34].

Intracerebral hemorrhage

ICH is mainly caused by the bleeding of small arteries into the brain parenchyma, caused by CSVD, and is the most common manifestation of CAA. The most common sporadic small vessel diseases that cause ICH are deep perforating artery disease (also known as hypertensive arteriopathy or arteriosclerosis) and CAA. Deep perforating artery disease is mainly related to hypertension, which is a common cause of deep cerebral hemorrhage in the basal ganglia or brainstem, whereas CAA is caused by Aβ deposition in cortical and leptomeningeal vessels, which leads to lobar hemorrhage [35].
The average age at CAA-ICH onset is 73.2 years, and the number of cases increases with age [36]. Its clinical manifestations often vary depending on the size, location, and extent of bleeding, as well as the severity of the previous brain injury. Similar to hypertensive ICH, the clinical manifestations of CAA-ICH mainly include focal neurological manifestations, such as seizures, transient hemiplegia, consciousness disorders, aphasia, and visual field defects [37]. Lobar hematoma is the most serious complication of CAA, with a total mortality rate of 10%-40% in patients with CAA-related ICH and 10% risk of recurrence annually [38].
Some studies have shown that hypertension is not the most important risk factor for CAA-ICH, but that the presence of hypertension can increase the incidence of intracerebral hematoma in patients with CAA [39]. Using new imaging technologies to correctly evaluate will greatly improve disease diagnosis and treatment.

Transient focal neurological episodes

TFNEs, also known as amyloid seizures, are mostly recurrent, stereotyped, and transient (mostly no more than 10-30 min) and are accompanied by diffuse facial and hand sensory abnormalities [40,41].
The main positive TFNE symptoms are “premonitory” diffuse sensory abnormalities/positive visual phenomena or limb convulsions, whereas the main negative symptoms are “transient cerebral ischemia paroxysmal” sudden limb weakness, dysphasia, or vision loss [41]. Since both TFNE and transient ischemic attacks (TIA) manifest similar symptoms of neurological deficits, it is difficult to distinguish between them. However, TIA is usually characterized by transient negative symptoms, such as aphasia, fatigue, and hypoesthesia, whereas TFNE is mainly characterized by positive symptoms [42], which are mainly related to cortical spreading depolarization (also known as diffusion inhibition), corresponding to superficial hemorrhagic lesions associated with CAA [42]. In addition, the pathogeneses of the two are quite different; the former is a cerebrovascular ischemic event, whereas the latter involves leptomeningeal and cortical small blood vessel rupture and bleeding. The induction of CAA-related TFNE may be due to superficial cortical hemorrhage, which is called cSAH in acute cases and cortical superficial siderosis (cSS) in chronic cases. Currently, cSS is considered the strongest clinical marker of TFNE [43,44].
Antiplatelet therapy (APT) and anticoagulant therapy (ACT) may increase the risk of ICH, which may be caused by both CAA-related TFNE and cSS [45]. Therefore, it is necessary for CAA patients with TFNE to discontinue antiplatelet drugs to reduce the risk of lobar hemorrhage. Currently, research on CAA-related TFNE is mainly focused on improving the accuracy of diagnosis and treatment; thus, identifying suitable biological markers may improve this situation.

Cognitive impairment and dementia

Both CAA and AD exhibit abnormal amyloid deposition at the pathological level, and their comorbidity is very common in clinical practice. Autopsy evidence suggests that 80%-100% of patients with AD have deposition of CAA-like amyloid in their intracranial blood vessels, while 40%-60% of patients with CAA-ICH have pathological changes similar to those in AD in their brains [46].
Presently, the mechanism underlying the frequency and severity of cognitive impairment/dementia in patients with CAA is still unclear. Most symptoms of mild CAA cognitive impairment are not obvious. Cognitive impairment in moderate and severe CAA is mainly characterized by impairment of perceptual speed and episodic memory, rather than semantic memory, working memory, and visual spatial dysfunction [47]. Some scholars believe that reducing white matter damage, increasing cerebrovascular reactivity, and preventing cSS occurrence may have a positive regulatory effect on reducing CAA-induced cognitive impairment [48]. In addition, Rabin et al. [49] have shown that the association between severe CAA and a higher Aβ load can indirectly promote cognitive decline by increasing the deposition of tau protein. These findings suggest that tau protein can also drive cognitive impairment through AD-related pathways.

CAA imaging manifestations and imaging markers

Imaging findings of CAA mainly include two categories: bleeding signs, such as ICH, CMBs, and cSS, and non-bleeding signs, including white matter hyperintensity (WMH), enlarged PVS (EPVS), and cerebral microinfarction (CMI) (Figure 2) [50,51]. Some scholars believe that cortical atrophy [52] and lacunar infarction [53] are characteristic imaging findings of CAA; however, these findings remain controversial. Further in-depth research is required to explore their roles in CAA.

Cerebral microbleeds

CMBs are focal deposits of blood degradation products (including hemosiderin granules) in macrophages, which are caused by the decomposition of hemoglobin released from red blood cells after the degeneration of small vessels, resulting in blood extravasation. CMBs mainly occur in areas with a rich distribution of small blood vessels, such as the basal ganglia, thalamus, and cerebellum [54], which can affect the normal physiological function of brain tissue and lead to neurological functional decline. In general, CMBs have single or multiple, circular or quasi-circular, homogeneous, and well-defined signal missing areas with diameters of 2-5 mm (usually <10 mm) on susceptibility-weighted imaging and gradient recalled echo (GRE) T2*-weighted imaging [53,55].
CMBs are most common in the temporal-parietal cortex and preferentially occur in areas where amyloid deposits are locally increased, resulting in decreased executive function, slower information processing, and lower Mini-Mental State Examination scores [56]. In addition, the results of The Rotterdam Scan Study indicate that APOE ε4 alleles are closely related to the occurrence of multiple CMBs, and age is positively correlated with CMB occurrence [57].

White matter hyperintensity

WMH is an important imaging sign of CSVD that shows high-signal intensity on T2 and fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) sequences [58]. WMH includes two main categories: deep subcortical and periventricular WMH [59]. The severity of white matter lesions is typically evaluated using the Fazekas grading scale.
Xu et al. [60] suggested a positive correlation between WMH burden and the risk of recurrence of spontaneously hypertensive ICH, and the more serious the lesion, the more significant the correlation between them. Moreover, WMH of different lesion sites differentially affected cognition. Some studies have found that WMH of the frontal lobe mainly affects executive function; parietal-temporal WMH near the posterior horn mainly affects memory; and WMH of the deep white matter (including the corticospinal tract) significantly influences response speed [61,62]. Hypertension, type 2 diabetes, and smoking are considered the main risk factors for WMH [63].

Convex subarachnoid hemorrhage and cSS

CAA-related ICH is often accompanied by cSAH, another important CAA imaging marker. In general, cSAH refers to non-traumatic, non-aneurysmal SAH that only involves the sulcus of the cerebral cortex and does not involve the adjacent brain parenchyma or extend to the interhemispheric fissure, basal cistern, or ventricle [64]. It may be a characteristic manifestation of decreased vascular elasticity [65]. Conversely, cSS refers to the deposition of hemosiderin in the pia mater and/or spinal cord, which is generally considered to be the conversion of cSAH to subcortical hemosiderin deposition after weeks to months.
The FLAIR sequence has a high sensitivity and specificity for the diagnosis of acute cSAH. FLAIR mainly showed high signal intensity in one or more cerebral sulci in the convex cortex and low signal intensity in the GRE sequence, whereas cSS showed low signal intensity on both sides of the supratentorial sulcus on the T2*GRE sequence, showing a track appearance, but no corresponding high signal on FLAIR [66]. cSAH/cSS can serve as important imaging biomarkers of early recurrent CAA-ICH. Further in-depth research is needed on the relevant pathophysiological mechanisms and imaging manifestations to provide more evidence for the clinical diagnosis of CAA-ICH.

Enlarged perivascular space

PVS is the physiological space around small blood vessels, passing through the brain parenchyma from the subarachnoid space, and is considered to be part of the lymphatic system. It is an important channel for removing metabolic waste from the brain and maintaining the dynamic balance of fluid circulation [67-69]. Affected by age, sex, cardiovascular risk factors, APOE, head trauma, sleep disorders, and other magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) markers such as WMH [70-72], dysfunctional PVSs lead to the accumulation of toxins and physiological metabolites produced in the brain, resulting in further pathological damage and EPVS. It is generally believed that the formation of EPVS is related to the limitation of Aβ clearance.
EPVS can be quantified using high-resolution MRI. Common sites of EPVS include the basal ganglia, subcortical white matter, midbrain, and hippocampus, among which the central semiovale, basal ganglia, and midbrain are the three characteristic sites [73]. In view of its differential distribution, the EPVS signal on MRI was similar to that of the cerebrospinal fluid, and there was no obvious space-occupying or enhancement effect. Different sections are differently shaped, mainly showing clear boundaries and round, oval, or linear structures, with a maximum diameter of ≤3 mm [74]. These showed low signals on T1-weighted imaging (T1WI) sequences, high signals on T2WI, and low signals on FLAIR sequences, and were often accompanied by a perforating artery [75].

Cerebral microinfarcts

CMIs cannot be seen with the naked eye. Clear, defined lesions of cell death or tissue necrosis in the brain can be observed under a microscope, and sometimes cavities can be observed. The pathological manifestations are similar to those of common ischemic infarctions [76]. Corrada et al. [77] first described the pathological characteristics of CMI, namely, pale lesions, loss of vulnerable cells, proliferation of glial cells, and the presence of macrophages. CMI is considered to be closely related to intracranial atherosclerosis, arteriosclerosis or occlusion, stroke history, CAA, cerebral hypoperfusion, heart disease, etc.
Owing to the small size of microinfarctions, tracking them using conventional MRI is difficult. In recent years, with the continual development and innovation of imaging techniques, CMI usually shows cortical high-signal intensity on 7-T MRI with an ultra-high field strength in vitro on FLAIR and T2 sequences, whereas it shows low-signal intensity on T1 sequences, which is different from the pattern exhibited by PVS lesions of ≤3 mm size [78]. In addition, 3-T MRI can also detect the presence of CMI, but its sensitivity is very low compared to that of 7-T MRI (30%-40%) [79]. The results of the Medea-7T study showed that the frequency of CMI on 7-T MRI was similar in patients with vascular diseases and from memory clinics [80]. Microinfarction can be observed throughout the brain, and their distribution and number are closely related to the type and progression of dementia. Therefore, CMI may be an independent risk factor for CAA-associated cognitive impairment [81].

Diagnostic criteria for CAA and CAA-ri

Diagnosis of CAA

Currently, the diagnostic criteria for CAA are based on cohort study data. To date, the diagnostic criteria for CAA mainly include the Boston, Edinburgh, and CAA-ri diagnostic criteria. Among these, the most recognized Boston diagnostic criteria were updated to version 2.0. The evolution of the three versions of the diagnostic criteria is shown in Table 1 [82-84]. Patients who are unable to complete MRI examinations based on ICH indicated by computed tomography can be evaluated according to the presence or absence of SAH, finger hemorrhage, and APOE. Therefore, the Edinburgh diagnostic criteria were established (Table 2) [85].

Diagnostic criteria for CAA-ri

In 2011, based on the clinical manifestations and MRI results of patients, clinical diagnostic criteria for CAA-ri were proposed for the first time and were divided into confirmed CAA-ri and probable CAA-ri [86]. In 2016, Auriel et al. [87] updated the clinical imaging diagnostic criteria for CAA-ri based on the 2011 criteria. The evolution of the two sets of diagnostic criteria is shown in Table 3. In addition, pathological results confirmed that the sensitivity and specificity of the diagnostic criteria for probable CAA-ri were 82% and 97%, respectively, whereas those for possible CAA-ri were 82% and 68%, respectively [87].

Treatment for CAA and CAA-ri

To date, no specific treatment method is available for CAA and CAA-ri. Long-term management of patients with CAA mainly focuses on reducing the incidence and recurrence of cerebral hemorrhage and preventing dementia. The treatment method for CAA-related acute cerebral hemorrhage is the same as that used for other spontaneous cerebral hemorrhages. For patients with CAA and lobar cerebral hemorrhage, APT should be avoided as much as possible to reduce the risk of recurrent cerebral hemorrhage.
The American Heart Association/American Stroke Association recommends that ACT be avoided as much as possible for patients with previous CAA-ICH; however, patients with no history of cerebral hemorrhage can continue oral ACT [88]. In addition, blood pressure control in the acute stage of CAA-related ICH is closely associated with patient prognosis. Data from a systematic review and meta-analysis published by Moullaali et al. [89] showed that compared with placebo/guideline treatment, active/intensive antihypertensive intervention within 7 days after acute ICH significantly reduced the size of absolute/relative intracerebral hematoma, although it did not improve the patients’ functional prognosis. However, Rehni et al. [90] found that treatment with red blood cell-derived microparticles in a rat model of ICH significantly limited the expansion of hematoma and improved the prognosis of ICH. A study using a mouse model of ICH also found that meningeal lymphangiogenesis and lymphatic drainage increased on days 10-14 after ICH and lasted for at least 2 months after ICH. Early enhancement of the meningeal lymphatic function can promote hematoma absorption and reduce hematoma volume, thereby improving mouse behavior. These studies provide a new research direction for CAA-ICH diagnosis and treatment, which will improve patient prognosis by controlling blood pressure and promoting hematoma absorption [91].
In recent years, research has shifted from CAA-related treatments to immunotherapies. Xiong et al. [92] showed that the specific binding of anti-APOE antibody HAE-4 to low-fat APOE in the core of the plaque reduced amyloid protein deposition, while simultaneously inhibiting reactive microglia and astrocytes in the cortex, thus improving CAA-induced cerebral vascular dysfunction. An experiment on Tg-SwDI mice confirmed that fruquintinib, a highly selective antibody against vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR), reduced VEGFR accumulation and controlled inflammation and neuronal death, thereby reducing Aβ deposition in the cerebral cortex and hippocampus of mice, effectively treating CAA [93].
Moreover, given that previous research has suggested that CAA-ri is a special autoimmunity-mediated subtype of CAA, immunotherapy is considered a key treatment for CAA-ri. Regenhardt et al. [94] reported favorable results from immunosuppressive therapy including corticosteroids and cyclophosphamide for CAA-ri, with 94% patients showing improved clinical symptoms and 86% with improved imaging findings; thus, immunosuppressive therapy reduced the risk of CAA-ri recurrence.

Conclusion and future prospects

In the past 10 years, research on CAA has been ongoing and productive. Understanding the pathophysiology of CAA is expected to help provide systematic and personalized diagnosis and treatment programs for the control of blood pressure, medical and surgical intervention for hematoma, and discover emerging immunotherapies. Additionally, continual innovation in new imaging methods and testing of cerebrospinal fluid and genes will forge the path to a more accurate diagnosis and treatment route for CAA, especially CAA-ri. Thus will lower patient mortality and improve their quality of life.


Funding statement
The research was funded by the Natural Science Foundation of Shanghai (20ZR1434200).
Conflicts of interest
The authors have no financial conflicts of interest.
Author contribution
Conceptualization: YF, JL. Study design: LW. Methodology: LW, YF. Data collection: LW, QL. Investigation: LW, QL, DY. Statistical analysis: LW, YF, JL. Writing—original draft: LW, QL. Writing—review & editing: LW, QL, DY. Funding acquisition: YF, JL. Approval of final manuscript: all authors.

Figure 1.
APOE gene and pathophysiological mechanism of cerebral amyloid angiopathy. APOE, apolipoprotein E; APP, amyloid precursor protein; Aβ, amyloid β; LDL, low-density lipoprotein.
Figure 2.
Schematic diagram of the common imaging and typical magnetic resonance imaging findings of cerebral amyloid angiopathy. cSAH, convex subarachnoid hemorrhage; cSS, cortical superficial siderosis; EPVS, enlarged perivascular space; CMB, cerebral microbleed; WMH, white matter hyperintensity; CMI, cerebral microinfarction; ICH, intracerebral hemorrhage.
Table 1.
Evolution of the Boston diagnostic criteria for CAA-related cerebral hemorrhage [82-84]
Boston 1.0 Boston 1.5 Boston 2.0
Definite CAA The complete autopsy results confirmed that lobar, cortical or subcortical hemorrhage was found with severe vascular Aβ deposition on the premise of excluding other etiological diagnosis. No change No change
Probable CAA with supporting pathology Clinical symptoms and pathological tissue or cortical biopsy confirmed that on the premise of excluding other etiological diagnosis, cerebral lobe, cortical or subcortical cerebral hemorrhage with a certain degree of vascular Aβ deposition. No change No change
Probable CAA Clinical symptoms and MRI/CT confirmed that multiple cerebral hemorrhage (including cerebellar hemorrhage) limited to lobar, cortical or subcortical, age ≥55 years old, other diagnoses were excluded. Clinical symptoms and MRI/CT confirmed that (strictly) multiple hemorrhage (including cerebellar hemorrhage) limited to lobar, cortical or subcortical or single lobar, cortical or subcortical cerebral hemorrhage and focal/diffuse cSS, age ≥55 years old, other diagnoses were excluded. 1. Main diagnostic criteria:
1) Age ≥50 years old. Clinical manifestations: ICH, TFNE, cognitive impairment
2) Imaging findings: there were more than 2 foci of frontal hemorrhage on T2*GRE: cerebral hemorrhage, CMBs and cSS, without any other deep lesions, and other diagnoses were excluded.
2. Supporting evidence: severe CSO-PVS, multifocal hyperintensity distribution of frontal white matter
Possible CAA Clinical symptoms and MRI/CT confirmed: multiple cerebral hemorrhage (including cerebellar hemorrhage) in single lobe, cortex or subcortex, age ≥55 years old, other diagnosis was excluded. Clinical symptoms and MRI/CT confirmed multiple hemorrhage in a single lobe, cortex or subcortex (including cerebellar hemorrhage), focal/diffuse cSS, age ≥55 years old, excluding other diagnoses. Deleted
CAA, cerebral amyloid angiopathy; Aβ, amyloid β; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; CT, computed tomography; cSS, cortical superficial siderosis; ICH, intracerebral hemorrhage; TFNEs, transient focal neurological episodes; T2*GRE, T2*-weighted gradient recalled echo; CMBs, cerebral microbleeds; CSO-PVS, perivascular space in centrum semiovale.
Table 2.
The Edinburgh diagnostic standards [85]
Possibility of moderate to severe CAA Subarachnoid hemorrhage Carrying APOE ε4 Finger-like projections
Low (<7%) - - -
+ - -
Medium (44%-64%) - + -
+ + -
High (>95%) + - +
+ + +
CAA, cerebral amyloid angiopathy; APOE, apolipoprotein E.
Table 3.
Diagnostic criteria for CAA-related inflammation [87]
Version 2011 Version 2016
Probable CAA 1. The clinical symptoms are acute or subacute attack; 1. Age ≥40 years old;
2. Age ≥40 years old; 2. There are more than 1 of the following clinical manifestations: headache, loss of consciousness, behavior changes, focal neurological signs, epilepsy (acute, subacute/chronic); these clinical manifestations are not directly caused by acute cerebral hemorrhage;
3. At least one of the following symptoms: headache, mental/behavioral changes, focal neurological impairment or seizures;
4. MRI suggests flaky/fused WMH on T2 or FLAIR sequences: usually asymmetrical, with or without mass, with or without 3. MRI showed that single/multiple WMH lesions were asymmetric and extended to subcortical white matter, and asymmetric lesions were not caused by previous intracerebral hemorrhage;
5. Evidence of CAA already exists in SWI sequence: multiple cortical or subcortical hemorrhage or microhemorrhage, recent or previous lobar hemorrhage; 4. There are ≥1 cortical/subcortical hemorrhagic lesions, including cerebral hemorrhage, cerebral microhemorrhage and iron deposition on the cortical surface;
6. Exclude infection, tumor and other causes. 5. Exclude infection, tumor and other causes.
Definite CAA All of the above+pathological confirmation: 1. Age ≥40 years old;
1. Inflammation around, through, or in the walls of blood vessels; 2. There are more than 1 of the following clinical manifestations: headache, decreased consciousness, behavior changes, focal neurological signs, epilepsy, which are not directly caused by acute cerebral hemorrhage;
2. Intravascular powder deposition in cortex and pia mater.
3. MRI showed that WMH lesions extended directly to subcortical white matter;
4. There are ≥1 cortical/subcortical hemorrhagic lesions, including cerebral hemorrhage, cerebral microhemorrhage and iron deposition on the cortical surface;
5. Exclude infection, tumor and other causes.
CAA, cerebral amyloid angiopathy; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; WMH, white matter hyperintensity; FLAIR, fluid-attenuated inversion recovery; SWI, susceptibility weighting imaging; WMH, white matter hyperintensity.


1. Zhang-Nunes SX, Maat-Schieman ML, van Duinen SG, Roos RA, Frosch MP, Greenberg SM. The cerebral beta-amyloid angiopathies: hereditary and sporadic. Brain Pathol 2006;16:30-39.
pmid pmc
2. Viswanathan A, Greenberg SM. Cerebral amyloid angiopathy in the elderly. Ann Neurol 2011;70:871-880.
crossref pmid pmc
3. Boyle PA, Yu L, Nag S, Leurgans S, Wilson RS, Bennett DA, et al. Cerebral amyloid angiopathy and cognitive outcomes in community-based older persons. Neurology 2015;85:1930-1936.
crossref pmid pmc
4. Banerjee G, Carare R, Cordonnier C, Greenberg SM, Schneider JA, Smith EE, et al. The increasing impact of cerebral amyloid angiopathy: essential new insights for clinical practice. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2017;88:982-994.
crossref pmid pmc
5. Jaunmuktane Z, Quaegebeur A, Taipa R, Viana-Baptista M, Barbosa R, Koriath C, et al. Evidence of amyloid-β cerebral amyloid angiopathy transmission through neurosurgery. Acta Neuropathol 2018;135:671-679.
crossref pmid pmc pdf
6. Banerjee G, Samra K, Adams ME, Jaunmuktane Z, Parry-Jones AR, Grieve J, et al. Iatrogenic cerebral amyloid angiopathy: an emerging clinical phenomenon. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2022;93:693-700.
7. Yamada M. Cerebral amyloid angiopathy: emerging concepts. J Stroke 2015;17:17-30.
crossref pmid pmc
8. Kamp JA, Moursel LG, Haan J, Terwindt GM, Lesnik Oberstein SA, van Duinen SG, et al. Amyloid β in hereditary cerebral hemorrhage with amyloidosis-Dutch type. Rev Neurosci 2014;25:641-651.
crossref pmid
9. Ristori E, Donnini S, Ziche M. New insights into blood-brain barrier maintenance: the homeostatic role of β-amyloid precursor protein in cerebral vasculature. Front Physiol 2020;11:1056.
crossref pmid pmc
10. Levy E, Lopez-Otin C, Ghiso J, Geltner D, Frangione B. Stroke in icelandic patients with hereditary amyloid angiopathy is related to a mutation in the cystatin C gene, an inhibitor of cysteine proteases. J Exp Med 1989;169:1771-1778.
crossref pmid pmc pdf
11. Ghiso J, Jensson O, Frangione B. Amyloid fibrils in hereditary cerebral hemorrhage with amyloidosis of Icelandic type is a variant of gamma-trace basic protein (cystatin C). Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1986;83:2974-2978.
crossref pmid pmc
12. Koemans EA, Castello JP, Rasing I, Abramson JR, Voigt S, Perosa V, et al. Sex differences in onset and progression of cerebral amyloid angiopathy. Stroke 2023;54:306-314.
crossref pmid pmc
13. Pantoni L. Cerebral small vessel disease: from pathogenesis and clinical characteristics to therapeutic challenges. Lancet Neurol 2010;9:689-701.
crossref pmid
14. Thal DR, Walter J, Saido TC, Fändrich M. Neuropathology and biochemistry of Aβ and its aggregates in Alzheimer’s disease. Acta Neuropathol 2015;129:167-182.
crossref pmid pdf
15. DeSimone CV, Graff-Radford J, El-Harasis MA, Rabinstein AA, Asirvatham SJ, Holmes DR Jr. Cerebral amyloid angiopathy: diagnosis, clinical implications, and management strategies in atrial fibrillation. J Am Coll Cardiol 2017;70:1173-1182.
16. Thal DR, Ghebremedhin E, Rüb U, Yamaguchi H, Del Tredici K, Braak H. Two types of sporadic cerebral amyloid angiopathy. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol 2002;61:282-293.
crossref pmid
17. Thal DR, Ghebremedhin E, Orantes M, Wiestler OD. Vascular pathology in Alzheimer disease: correlation of cerebral amyloid angiopathy and arteriosclerosis/lipohyalinosis with cognitive decline. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol 2003;62:1287-1301.
crossref pmid
18. Charidimou A, Meegahage R, Fox Z, Peeters A, Vandermeeren Y, Laloux P, et al. Enlarged perivascular spaces as a marker of underlying arteriopathy in intracerebral haemorrhage: a multicentre MRI cohort study. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2013;84:624-629.
crossref pmid pmc
19. Falcone GJ, Woo D. Genetics of spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage. Stroke 2017;48:3420-3424.
crossref pmid pmc
20. Carpenter AM, Singh IP, Gandhi CD, Prestigiacomo CJ. Genetic risk factors for spontaneous intracerebral haemorrhage. Nat Rev Neurol 2016;12:40-49.
crossref pmid pdf
21. Serrano-Pozo A, Das S, Hyman BT. APOE and Alzheimer’s disease: advances in genetics, pathophysiology, and therapeutic approaches. Lancet Neurol 2021;20:68-80.
crossref pmid pmc
22. Rannikmäe K, Samarasekera N, Martînez-Gonzâlez NA, AlShahi Salman R, Sudlow CL. Genetics of cerebral amyloid angiopathy: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2013;84:901-908.
crossref pmid
23. Lamar M, Yu L, Rubin LH, James BD, Barnes LL, Farfel JM, et al. APOE genotypes as a risk factor for age-dependent accumulation of cerebrovascular disease in older adults. Alzheimers Dement 2019;15:258-266.
crossref pmid pmc pdf
24. Chu S, Xu F, Su Y, Chen H, Cheng X. Cerebral amyloid angiopathy (CAA)-related inflammation: comparison of inflammatory CAA and amyloid-β-related angiitis. J Alzheimers Dis 2016;51:525-532.
crossref pmid
25. Chwalisz BK. Cerebral amyloid angiopathy and related inflammatory disorders. J Neurol Sci 2021;424:117425.
crossref pmid
26. Kirshner HS, Bradshaw M. The inflammatory form of cerebral amyloid angiopathy or “cerebral amyloid angiopathy-related inflammation” (CAARI). Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep 2015;15:54.
crossref pmid pdf
27. Theodorou A, Palaiodimou L, Safouris A, Kargiotis O, Psychogios K, Kotsali-Peteinelli V, et al. Cerebral amyloid angiopathy-related inflammation: a single-center experience and a literature review. J Clin Med 2022;11:6731.
crossref pmid pmc
28. Scolding NJ, Joseph F, Kirby PA, Mazanti I, Gray F, Mikol J, et al. Abeta-related angiitis: primary angiitis of the central nervous system associated with cerebral amyloid angiopathy. Brain 2005;128:500-515.
crossref pmid
29. Auriel E, Greenberg SM. The pathophysiology and clinical presentation of cerebral amyloid angiopathy. Curr Atheroscler Rep 2012;14:343-350.
crossref pmid pdf
30. Renard D, Tatu L, Collombier L, Wacongne A, Ayrignac X, Charif M, et al. Cerebral amyloid angiopathy and cerebral amyloid angiopathy-related inflammation: comparison of hemorrhagic and DWI MRI features. J Alzheimers Dis 2018;64:1113-1121.
crossref pmid
31. Zhou H, Gao F, Yang X, Lin T, Li Z, Wang Q, et al. Endothelial BACE1 impairs cerebral small vessels via tight junctions and eNOS. Circ Res 2022;130:1321-1341.
crossref pmid
32. Ihara M. Endothelial BACE1: bridging the gap between hypertension and Alzheimer’s disease. Circ Res 2022;130:1342-1344.
crossref pmid
33. Koelsch G. BACE1 function and inhibition: implications of intervention in the amyloid pathway of Alzheimer’s disease pathology. Molecules 2017;22:1723.
crossref pmid pmc
34. Charidimou A, Boulouis G, Gurol ME, Ayata C, Bacskai BJ, Frosch MP, et al. Emerging concepts in sporadic cerebral amyloid angiopathy. Brain 2017;140:1829-1850.
crossref pmid pmc
35. Lovelock CE, Molyneux AJ, Rothwell PM; Oxford Vascular Study. Change in incidence and aetiology of intracerebral haemorrhage in Oxfordshire, UK, between 1981 and 2006: a population-based study. Lancet Neurol 2007;6:487-493.
crossref pmid
36. Chao CP, Kotsenas AL, Broderick DF. Cerebral amyloid angiopathy: CT and MR imaging findings. Radiographics 2006;26:1517-1531.
crossref pmid
37. Capron J. [Diagnosis and management of sporadic cerebral amyloid angiopathy]. Prat Neurol FMC 2016;7:239-249. French.

38. Block F, Dafotakis M. Cerebral amyloid angiopathy in stroke medicine. Dtsch Arztebl Int 2017;114:37-42.
crossref pmid pmc
39. Hirohata M, Yoshita M, Ishida C, Ikeda SI, Tamaoka A, Kuzuhara S, et al. Clinical features of non-hypertensive lobar intracerebral hemorrhage related to cerebral amyloid angiopathy. Eur J Neurol 2010;17:823-829.
crossref pmid
40. Charidimou A. Cerebral amyloid angiopathy-related transient focal neurological episodes (CAA-TFNEs): a well-defined clinical-radiological syndrome. J Neurol Sci 2019;406:116496.
crossref pmid
41. Charidimou A, Peeters A, Fox Z, Gregoire SM, Vandermeeren Y, Laloux P, et al. Spectrum of transient focal neurological episodes in cerebral amyloid angiopathy: multicentre magnetic resonance imaging cohort study and meta-analysis. Stroke 2012;43:2324-2330.
crossref pmid
42. Smith EE, Charidimou A, Ayata C, Werring DJ, Greenberg SM. Cerebral amyloid angiopathy-related transient focal neurologic episodes. Neurology 2021;97:231-238.
crossref pmid pmc
43. Charidimou A, Linn J, Vernooij MW, Opherk C, Akoudad S, Baron JC, et al. Cortical superficial siderosis: detection and clinical significance in cerebral amyloid angiopathy and related conditions. Brain 2015;138:2126-2139.
crossref pmid
44. Charidimou A, Jäger RH, Fox Z, Peeters A, Vandermeeren Y, Laloux P, et al. Prevalence and mechanisms of cortical superficial siderosis in cerebral amyloid angiopathy. Neurology 2013;81:626-632.
crossref pmid
45. Vales-Montero M, García-Pastor A, Iglesias-Mohedano AM, Esteban-de Antonio E, Salgado-Cámara P, García-Domínguez JM, et al. Cerebral amyloid angiopathy-related transient focal neurological episodes: a transient ischemic attack mimic with an increased risk of intracranial hemorrhage. J Neurol Sci 2019;406:116452.
crossref pmid
46. Ellis RJ, Olichney JM, Thal LJ, Mirra SS, Morris JC, Beekly D, et al. Cerebral amyloid angiopathy in the brains of patients with Alzheimer’s disease: the CERAD experience, Part XV. Neurology 1996;46:1592-1596.
crossref pmid
47. Arvanitakis Z, Leurgans SE, Wang Z, Wilson RS, Bennett DA, Schneider JA. Cerebral amyloid angiopathy pathology and cognitive domains in older persons. Ann Neurol 2011;69:320-327.
crossref pmid pmc
48. Durrani R, Wang M, Cox E, Irving E, Saad F, McCreary CR, et al. Mediators of cognitive impairment in cerebral amyloid angiopathy. Int J Stroke 2023;18:78-84.
crossref pmid pdf
49. Rabin JS, Nichols E, La Joie R, Casaletto KB, Palta P, Dams-O’Connor K, et al. Cerebral amyloid angiopathy interacts with neuritic amyloid plaques to promote tau and cognitive decline. Brain 2022;145:2823-2833.
crossref pmid pmc pdf
50. Charidimou A, Martinez-Ramirez S, Reijmer YD, Oliveira-Filho J, Lauer A, Roongpiboonsopit D, et al. Total magnetic resonance imaging burden of small vessel disease in cerebral amyloid angiopathy: an imaging-pathologic study of concept validation. JAMA Neurol 2016;73:994-1001.
crossref pmid pmc
51. Appleton JP, Woodhouse LJ, Adami A, Becker JL, Berge E, Cala LA, et al. Imaging markers of small vessel disease and brain frailty, and outcomes in acute stroke. Neurology 2020;94:e439-e452.
crossref pmid pmc
52. Horn MJ, Gokcal E, Becker AJ, Das AS, Warren AD; Alzheimer Disease Neuroimaging Initiative; Schwab K, et al. Cerebellar atrophy and its implications on gait in cerebral amyloid angiopathy. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2022;93:802-807.
53. Pasi M, Boulouis G, Fotiadis P, Auriel E, Charidimou A, Haley K, et al. Distribution of lacunes in cerebral amyloid angiopathy and hypertensive small vessel disease. Neurology 2017;88:2162-2168.
crossref pmid pmc
54. Werring DJ, Gregoire SM, Cipolotti L. Cerebral microbleeds and vascular cognitive impairment. J Neurol Sci 2010;299(1-2):P131-P135.
55. Greenberg SM, Vernooij MW, Cordonnier C, Viswanathan A, Al-Shahi Salman R, Warach S, et al. Cerebral microbleeds: a guide to detection and interpretation. Lancet Neurol 2009;8:165-174.
crossref pmid pmc
56. Polyakova TA, Levin OS. [Cerebral microbleeds in cerebrovascular and neurodegenerative diseases with cognitive impairment]. Zh Nevrol Psikhiatr Im S S Korsakova 2016;116:19-27. Russian.
57. Vernooij MW, van der Lugt A, Ikram MA, Wielopolski PA, Niessen WJ, Hofman A, et al. Prevalence and risk factors of cerebral microbleeds: the Rotterdam Scan Study. Neurology 2008;70:1208-1214.
crossref pmid
58. Wang S, Zhang F, Huang P, Hong H, Jiaerken Y, Yu X, et al. Superficial white matter microstructure affects processing speed in cerebral small vessel disease. Hum Brain Mapp 2022;43:5310-5325.
crossref pmid pmc pdf
59. Chen J, Mikheev AV, Yu H, Gruen MD, Rusinek H, Ge Y; Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative. Bilateral distance partition of periventricular and deep white matter hyperintensities: performance of the method in the aging brain. Acad Radiol 2021;28:1699-1708.
crossref pmid pmc
60. Xu M, Cheng Y, Song Q, Yuan R, Zhang S, Hao Z, et al. Total burden of cerebral small vessel disease in recurrent ICH versus first-ever ICH. Aging Dis 2019;10:570-577.
crossref pmid pmc
61. Debette S, Markus HS. The clinical importance of white matter hyperintensities on brain magnetic resonance imaging: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ 2010;341:c3666.
crossref pmid pmc
62. Lampe L, Kharabian-Masouleh S, Kynast J, Arelin K, Steele CJ, Löffler M, et al. Lesion location matters: the relationships between white matter hyperintensities on cognition in the healthy elderly. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 2019;39:36-43.
crossref pmid pmc pdf
63. Brown R, Low A, Markus HS. Rate of, and risk factors for, white matter hyperintensity growth: a systematic review and meta-analysis with implications for clinical trial design. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2021;92:1271-1277.
crossref pmid
64. Charidimou A, Boulouis G, Fotiadis P, Xiong L, Ayres AM, Schwab KM, et al. Acute convexity subarachnoid haemorrhage and cortical superficial siderosis in probable cerebral amyloid angiopathy without lobar haemorrhage. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2018;89:397-403.
crossref pmid pmc
65. Raposo N, Charidimou A, Roongpiboonsopit D, Onyekaba M, Gurol ME, Rosand J, et al. Convexity subarachnoid hemorrhage in lobar intracerebral hemorrhage: a prognostic marker. Neurology 2020;94:e968-e977.
pmid pmc
66. Markus HS, de Leeuw FE. Cerebral small vessel disease: recent advances and future directions. Int J Stroke 2023;18:4-14.
crossref pmid pmc pdf
67. Yu L, Hu X, Li H, Zhao Y. Perivascular spaces, glymphatic system and MR. Front Neurol 2022;13:844938.
crossref pmid pmc
68. Evans TE, Knol MJ, Schwingenschuh P, Wittfeld K, Hilal S, Ikram MA, et al. Determinants of perivascular spaces in the general population: a pooled cohort analysis of individual participant data. Neurology 2023;100:e107-e122.
pmid pmc
69. Ramirez J, Berezuk C, McNeely AA, Gao F, McLaurin J, Black SE. Imaging the perivascular space as a potential biomarker of neurovascular and neurodegenerative diseases. Cell Mol Neurobiol 2016;36:289-299.
crossref pmid pdf
70. Inglese M, Bomsztyk E, Gonen O, Mannon LJ, Grossman RI, Rusinek H. Dilated perivascular spaces: hallmarks of mild traumatic brain injury. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2005;26:719-724.
pmid pmc
71. Kwee RM, Kwee TC. Virchow-Robin spaces at MR imaging. Radiographics 2007;27:1071-1086.
crossref pmid
72. Wardlaw JM, Smith EE, Biessels GJ, Cordonnier C, Fazekas F, Frayne R, et al. Neuroimaging standards for research into small vessel disease and its contribution to ageing and neurodegeneration. Lancet Neurol 2013;12:822-838.
crossref pmid pmc
73. Passiak BS, Liu D, Kresge HA, Cambronero FE, Pechman KR, Osborn KE, et al. Perivascular spaces contribute to cognition beyond other small vessel disease markers. Neurology 2019;92:e1309-e1321.
crossref pmid pmc
74. Perosa V, Oltmer J, Munting LP, Freeze WM, Auger CA, Scherlek AA, et al. Perivascular space dilation is associated with vascular amyloid-β accumulation in the overlying cortex. Acta Neuropathol 2022;143:331-348.
crossref pmid pmc pdf
75. Montagne A, Nation DA, Sagare AP, Barisano G, Sweeney MD, Chakhoyan A, et al. APOE4 leads to blood-brain barrier dysfunction predicting cognitive decline. Nature 2020;581:71-76.
pmid pmc
76. Smith EE, Schneider JA, Wardlaw JM, Greenberg SM. Cerebral microinfarcts: the invisible lesions. Lancet Neurol 2012;11:272-282.
crossref pmid pmc
77. Corrada MM, Sonnen JA, Kim RC, Kawas CH. Microinfarcts are common and strongly related to dementia in the oldest-old: the 90+ study. Alzheimers Dement 2016;12:900-908.
crossref pmid pmc pdf
78. van Veluw SJ, Charidimou A, van der Kouwe AJ, et al. Microbleed and microinfarct detection in amyloid angiopathy: a high-resolution MRI-histopathology study. Brain 2016;139:3151-3162.
crossref pmid pmc
79. van Dalen JW, Scuric EE, van Veluw SJ, Caan MW. Cortical microinfarcts detected in vivo on 3 Tesla MRI: clinical and radiological correlates. Stroke 2015;46:255-257.
crossref pmid
80. Zwartbol MH, Rissanen I, Ghaznawi R, de Bresser J, Kuijf HJ, Blom K, et al. Cortical cerebral microinfarcts on 7T MRI: risk factors, neuroimaging correlates and cognitive functioning - the Medea-7T study. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 2021;41:3127-3138.
crossref pmid pmc pdf
81. Hilal S, Sikking E, Shaik MA, Chan QL, van Veluw SJ, Vrooman H, et al. Cortical cerebral microinfarcts on 3T MRI: a novel marker of cerebrovascular disease. Neurology 2016;87:1583-1590.
crossref pmid
82. Greenberg SM, Charidimou A. Diagnosis of cerebral amyloid angiopathy: evolution of the Boston criteria. Stroke 2018;49:491-497.
crossref pmid pmc
83. Linn J, Halpin A, Demaerel P, Ruhland J, Giese AD, Dichgans M, et al. Prevalence of superficial siderosis in patients with cerebral amyloid angiopathy. Neurology 2010;74:1346-1350.
crossref pmid pmc
84. Charidimou A, Boulouis G, Frosch MP, Baron JC, Pasi M, Albucher JF, et al. The Boston criteria version 2.0 for cerebral amyloid angiopathy: a multicentre, retrospective, MRI-neuropathology diagnostic accuracy study. Lancet Neurol 2022;21:714-725.
pmid pmc
85. Rodrigues MA, Samarasekera N, Lerpiniere C, Humphreys C, McCarron MO, White PM, et al. The Edinburgh CT and genetic diagnostic criteria for lobar intracerebral haemorrhage associated with cerebral amyloid angiopathy: model development and diagnostic test accuracy study. Lancet Neurol 2018;17:232-240.
pmid pmc
86. Chung KK, Anderson NE, Hutchinson D, Synek B, Barber PA. Cerebral amyloid angiopathy related inflammation: three case reports and a review. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2011;82:20-26.
crossref pmid
87. Auriel E, Charidimou A, Gurol ME, Ni J, Van Etten ES, Martinez-Ramirez S, et al. Validation of clinicoradiological criteria for the diagnosis of cerebral amyloid angiopathy-related inflammation. JAMA Neurol 2016;73:197-202.
crossref pmid
88. Hemphill JC 3rd, Greenberg SM, Anderson CS, Becker K, Bendok BR, Cushman M, et al. Guidelines for the management of spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage: a guideline for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke 2015;46:2032-2060.
crossref pmid
89. Moullaali TJ, Wang X, Sandset EC, Woodhouse LJ, Law ZK, Arima H, et al. Early lowering of blood pressure after acute intracerebral haemorrhage: a systematic review and meta-analysis of individual patient data. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2022;93:6-13.
crossref pmid pmc
90. Rehni AK, Cho S, Quero HN, Shukla V, Zhang Z, Dong C, et al. Red Blood cell microparticles limit hematoma growth in intracerebral hemorrhage. Stroke 2022;53:3182-3191.
crossref pmid pmc
91. Tsai HH, Hsieh YC, Lin JS, Kuo ZT, Ho CY, Chen CH, et al. Functional investigation of meningeal lymphatic system in experimental intracerebral hemorrhage. Stroke 2022;53:987-998.
crossref pmid
92. Xiong M, Jiang H, Serrano JR, Gonzales ER, Wang C, Gratuze M, et al. APOE immunotherapy reduces cerebral amyloid angiopathy and amyloid plaques while improving cerebrovascular function. Sci Transl Med 2021;13:eabd7522.
crossref pmid pmc
93. Zhou G, Xiang T, Xu Y, He B, Wu L, Zhu G, et al. Fruquintinib/HMPL-013 ameliorates cognitive impairments and pathology in a mouse model of cerebral amyloid angiopathy (CAA). Eur J Pharmacol 2023;939:175446.
crossref pmid
94. Regenhardt RW, Thon JM, Das AS, Thon OR, Charidimou A, Viswanathan A, et al. Association between immunosuppressive treatment and outcomes of cerebral amyloid angiopathy-related inflammation. JAMA Neurol 2020;77:1261-1269.
crossref pmid pmc


Browse all articles >

Editorial Office
Department of Neurology, Asan Medical Center,Ulsan University College of Medicine
88, Olympic-ro 43-gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul 05505, Korea
Submission, status and progress, etc ⟫ E-mail: editor@j-stroke.org
Website and system ⟫ E-mail: journal@m2community.co.kr
Publishing company ⟫ E-mail: ka72sus@smileml.com
Developed in M2PI
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Stroke Society.
Close layer
prev next