J Stroke Search


J Stroke > Volume 24(3); 2022 > Article
Choi-Kwon and Kim: Anger, a Result and Cause of Stroke: A Narrative Review


Post-stroke mood and emotional disturbances are frequent and diverse in their manifestations. Among them, post-stroke depression is the best known. Although post-stroke anger (PSA) has been studied relatively less, it can be as frequent as depression. Manifestations of PSA range from overt aggressive behaviors (including hitting or hurting others) to becoming irritable, impulsive, hostile, and less tolerable to family members. The possible pathophysiological mechanisms of PSA include neurochemical dysfunction due to brain injury, frustration associated with neurological deficits or unfavorable environments, and genetic predisposition. PSA causes distress in both patients and their caregivers, negatively influences the patient’s quality of life, and increases the burden on caregivers. It can be treated or prevented using various methods, including pharmacological therapies. In addition, anger or hostility may also be a risk or triggering factor for stroke. The hazardous effects of anger may be mediated by other risk factors, including hypertension or diabetes mellitus. The identification of anger as a result or cause of stroke is important because strategic management of anger may help improve the patient’s quality of life or prevent stroke occurrence. In this narrative review, we describe the phenomenology, prevalence, factors or predictors, relevant lesion locations, and pharmacological treatment of PSA. We further describe the current evidence on anger as a risk or triggering factor for stroke.


Stroke survivors frequently present with complications of mood and emotional disturbances, including depression, anxiety, and emotional incontinence [1]. Additionally, they often show feelings of anger, angry outbursts, irritation and impulsiveness, and aggressive behavior toward others. The pathogenesis and predictors of this post-stroke anger (PSA) and its relationship with lesion locations remain uncertain. Although the overall negative impact of PSA appears to be less severe than that of post-stroke depression, it still causes distress and embarrassment, decreases patients’ quality of life (QOL) [2], and increases caregiver burden [3]. PSA can be treated or prevented by various methods, including pharmacological therapy. However, this important post-stroke symptom has been underdiagnosed, neglected, and understudied.
Furthermore, anger may be a risk or triggering factor for stroke. The hazardous effects of anger may be mediated by other risk factors, including hypertension or diabetes mellitus. The identification of anguish or negative feelings as risk factors or triggers of stroke is important because strategies to manage an individual’s anger may prevent stroke occurrence. Thus, anger may be both a result and cause of stroke. In this narrative review, we first describe the phenomenology, prevalence, factors or predictors, relevant lesion locations, and pharmacological treatment for PSA. We then describe the current evidence on anger as a risk or triggering factor for stroke.

Strategy for literature search

We selected all pertinent articles published until May 2022, which were related to anger either as a post-stroke symptom or as a triggering/risk factor in stroke development, from the following databases: MEDLINE, PubMed, Index Medicus, Web of Science, Embase, CINAHL, SCOPUS, and Cochrane. Anger, anguish, anger proneness, emotional upset, impulsiveness, aggression, aggressive behavior, irritability, and hostility were used as search items. Relevant articles dealing with the above items were examined and included in this review, when necessary. We included only articles written in English.
In this search, we identified 4,231 articles (PubMed 360, CINAHL 38, Cochrane 54, MEDLINE 141, Scopus 1,132, Embase 1,204, Index Medicus 24, and Web of Science 1,278). Among them, 1,533 duplicate and 2,657 irrelevant articles were removed after reviewing the titles, abstracts, and details. Eight articles were included after a manual search. Consequently, 49 articles were finally included in this study, wherein 36 were related to PSA and 13 to anger as a risk or triggering factor. The details of the screening process are shown in Figure 1.

Anger as a result of stroke

Phenomenology and terminology

Patients with acute stroke often exhibit aggressive behavior, including hitting or hurting others, kicking, biting, grabbing, pushing, and throwing objects. Their verbal behavior may include cursing, screaming, or hostile muttering. In some cases, these behaviors are one of the broad manifestations of delirium [4] that include disturbances in attention, awareness, and cognition. Studies have also described a so-called “catastrophic reaction,” [5,6] which is a constellation of symptoms including anxiety reactions, tears, aggressive behavior, refusal, and swearing [5]. Typically, catastrophic reaction is present in patients with aphasia and elicited when the examiners ask the patients to do something that they find difficult to perform [6]. It remains uncertain whether these delirious behaviors and catastrophic reactions are truly related with patients’ anger. With the concomitant presence of delirous or aphasic symptoms, it is impossible to perfom the formal, standardized assessment of anger (see below). Moreover, these behaviors generally subside over time along with the disappearance of other delirious or aphasic symptoms [4,5]. Thus, the aggressive behaviors shown in these patients are unlikely to be an anger based on true emotion disturbances.
Therefore, we did not include these behaviors in this review. Instead, we discussed purely aggressive behaviors associated with anger in patients with stroke. Compared with their premorbid state, these patients become irritable, impulsive, hostile, and less tolerable and exhibit uncontrollable anger. They often express excessive anger at their spouse and other family members regarding trivial matters that would not have evoked anger in their pre-stroke stage [7]. These symptoms have been previously described as “the inability to control anger or aggression” [7] or “post-stroke anger proneness.” [8] Here, we will use a simpler and broader term, PSA.

Methods to assess PSA

Unfortunately, no standardized method exists for assessing PSA levels. Some studies have used the 10-item Spielberger Trait Anger Scale (see below). For each question, the patients are asked to use a numerical scale (1, almost never; 2, sometimes; 3, often; and 4, almost always) to best represent their status. An overall anger score can be obtained by summing the individual scores [7].
The 10-item Spielberger Trait Anger Scale
  • 1. I am quick-tempered.

  • 2. I have a fiery temper.

  • 3. I am a hotheaded person.

  • 4. I get angry when I am slowed down by others’ mistakes.

  • 5. I feel annoyed when I am not given recognition for doing good work.

  • 6. I fly off the handle.

  • 7. When I get angry, I say nasty things.

  • 8. It makes me furious when I am criticized in front of others.

  • 9. When I get frustrated, I feel like hitting someone.

  • 10. I feel infuriated when I do a good job and get a poor evaluation.

Because patients may have had anger before stroke occurrence, whether their anger was newly developed or increased in intensity after stroke needs to be identified. Thus, investigators compared the anger scores after stroke with those before stroke occurrence reported by the patients [7,9]. Because this requires patients’ intact memory and reliable response, this approach may be possible only in patients with relatively intact memory in the acute or subacute stage of stroke but not in those who experienced stroke long ago.
One study [10] utilized the Present State Examination, and patients were identified as ‘aggressive’ based on positive ratings of one or more of the following five items: (1) the patient acknowledges showing anger by shouting or quarreling (1 point), hitting people, throwing or breaking things (2 points); (2) the patient showed a discrete episode of violent behavior that had a catastrophic impact on others (e.g., significant bodily injury) (2 points) or more than one discrete episode of violence (3 points); (3) the patient showed hostile behavior to the examiner through anger, irritability, or overt aggression (1 point); (4) the patient showed agitation during the interview (1 point); or (5) the patient showed gross excitement or violence during the interview (1 point). These behaviors were reported by the patients, family members, or hospital staff members. An “aggression sub-score” may be calculated from these five items, with eight as the maximum score.
Another study [2] employed the Neuropsychiatric Inventory-Carers Distress Version, which is an informant-rated scale that measures 12 domains: delusion, hallucinations, agitation/aggression, depression/dysphoria, anxiety, elation/euphoria, apathy/indifference, disinhibition, irritability/liability, motor disturbance, nighttime behavior, and appetite.
Caregivers (e.g., family members or nurses in the residential facility) are first presented with a screening question, “Does the patient have periods when he/she refuses to cooperate or will not let people help him/her? Is he/she difficult to handle?” If the caregivers responded positively (“yes”) to the screening question, they are then asked to respond to eight additional questions aimed at quantifying the severity of agitation/aggression over the previous month. Positive responses to the screening question and at least one of the eight questions are required to confirm agitation/aggression. These questions can be divided into “passive” or “active” aggression categories, as shown below:
  • Passive 1. Does the patient get upset with those trying to care for him/her or resist activities, including bathing or changing clothes?

  • Passive 2. Is the patient stubborn and wants to have things in his/her way?

  • Passive 3. Is the patient uncooperative and resistive to help from others?

  • Passive 4. Does the patient have any other behavior that makes him/her difficult to handle?

  • Active 5. Does the patient shout or curse angrily?

  • Active 6. Does the patient slam doors, kick furniture, or throw objects?

  • Active 7. Does the patient attempt to hurt or hit others?

  • Active 8. Does the patient have any other aggressive or agitated behavior?

In another study [11], items that assessed anger, hostility, and aggression from several scales were used. From the Catastrophic Reaction Scale [12], items 5 (patient behaved angrily), 6 (patient complained of feeling angry), 7 (patient swore), and 8 (patient expressed displaced anger) were selected. From the Mania Rating Scale [13], items 5 (irritability) and 9 (disruptive-aggressive behavior) were chosen. Items 4 (hostile feelings) and 43 (hostility) of the Comprehensive Psychopathological Rating Scale [14] were also used. Patients were classified into “no anger” group if they scored 0 in all the selected items and into “anger” group, if not. Other rating tools used were the Emotional Behavior Index [15] and Emotional and Social Dysfunction Questionnaire [16].


The studies that investigated PSA prevalence are summarized in Table 1. In the acute stage of stroke (i.e., when patients are admitted to a hospital), PSA or aggressive behaviors occurred in 11% to 35% of the patients [9-11,15]. In the subacute stage (3 to 12 months after stroke onset), the prevalence was 19% to 32% [2,7]. Thus, despite the different study settings and diagnostic tools used, PSA appears to be relatively common during both the acute and subacute stages of stroke. Although PSA prevalence in the chronic stage of stroke has been rarely studied, a recent study [17] investigated the long-term change in anger score in patients with stroke. It was found that the average anger score measured by the Spielberger Trait Anger Scale was 22.9 at the acute (≤21 days after onset) stage of stroke, 21.6 at 6 months post-stroke, and 16.2 at long-term follow-up (average 5 years). Thus, after the acute/subacute stage of stroke, anger symptoms seem to gradually decrease over time.
Noh et al. [3] studied 23 patients (mean age, 55 years) with cerebral autosomal dominant arteriopathy with subcortical infarcts and leukoencephalopathy (CADASIL). Among all patients, 18 patients had an ischemic stroke, two had intracerebral hemorrhages, one had both ischemic stroke and intracerebral hemorrhage, and two had transient ischemic attacks. PSA was detected in five patients (22%).

Associated factors and lesion locations

Although young age and male sex have been reported as factors associated with PSA [16,18], the results were not replicated in other studies [7,9,11]. A study showed that in the acute phase of stroke, PSA was independently related to the presence of previous stroke, the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score, and monoamine oxidase A (MAO-A) polymorphisms associated with low activity [9]. In the subacute stage, motor dysfunction and dysarthria [7] and diabetes mellitus [2] were found to be associated with PSA. PSA has also been shown to be associated with depression [2,10,19]. However, in a study assessing both depression and emotional incontinence, PSA was more closely associated with emotional incontinence than depression [7].
The relationship between stroke lesion location and PSA remains unclear. One computed tomography scan study [19] reported that left hemispheric lesions and lesions located more proximal to the frontal cortex were associated with aggressive behavior. However, the patient number (n=10) was too small for a definitive conclusion. Kim et al. [7] analyzed brain lesions mostly using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and emphasized that PSA was closely associated with lesions involving the fronto-lenticulocapsular-pontine base area. Patients with lesions involving other areas, including the parietal, occipital, and cerebellar regions, rarely exhibited PSA. Another MRI study showed that PSA was closely associated with ventral pontine and lateral cerebellar infarcts [20]. Conversely, other studies [10,11] found no relation between stroke lesion location and PSA. However, in these studies, the lesion location was categorized more crudely. In one study, the severity of white matter hyperintensities was not associated with PSA [20].


Considering that PSA is related to the NIHSS score [9], motor dysfunction, and dysarthria [7], it may partly be a normal reactive response secondary to the patient’s neurological disabilities. One study [7] specifically asked 47 patients with PSA about the main reason for them getting angry, and 28% of them stated that their anger was caused by their neurological deficits. Furthermore, patients stated that their anger was provoked by family members (15 patients), colleagues at work (four patients), and unfavorable economic conditions (four patients). These observations, along with recent studies that showed a relationship between the lack of social support and PSA [17] and between PSA and depression [2,10,19], suggest that PSA might be a manifestation of depression or frustration in patients with stroke.
However, in the discussed study, 23% of patients stated that their anger occurred spontaneously without any specific reasons [7]. Spontaneous anger/aggression was also observed in most patients with provoked anger. Moreover, no differences were found in the frequency of motor dysfunction between patients with spontaneous anger and those with provoked anger. Finally, although PSA may be related to depression [2,10], the discussed study [7] showed that only 15% of the patients with PSA had depression, which was not different from the depression rate of patients without PSA (12%). Moreover, PSA was more closely related to emotional incontinence [7], a symptom presumably caused by neurochemical dysfunction secondary to a brain lesion [1], than depression. Thus, PSA may at least partly be a symptom related to brain injury itself, even in patients with physical disabilities. Although not unanimously agreed upon, PSA may be related to frontal-lenticular-pontine base lesions, which is also related to emotional incontinence [7]. Therefore, PSA may be caused by the disinhibition of impulse control secondary to brain injury. As selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) are effective in the management of PSA (see below), serotonergic dysfunction due to brain lesions has been suggested to induce PSA [1]. One study suggested that the brain serotonin system may work differently between “anger trait” and “state condition of anger.” [21]
Other studies have suggested that PSA may be associated with personality changes due to frontal lobe lesions, which result in increased aggression or exacerbation of preexisting aggressive behavior [10]. Along with the association between cognitive impairment and PSA, patients may also have anger due to frustration associated with impaired ability to communicate, inappropriate response to stimuli (including pain or noise), or misinterpretation of a caregiver’s action [10]. PSA may present as a manifestation of “behavioral and psychological symptoms” of vascular cognitive impairment (VCI). One study showed that 40% of patients with VCI exhibited agitation/aggression. These patients usually had multiple or diffuse cerebral infarcts, and their anger was mostly associated with cognitive impairment and other neuropsychiatric symptoms, including depression [22].
Finally, PSA may have a genetic predisposition. One study [23] based on the genotyping of serotonin-synthesizing tryptophan hydroxylase 2 (TPH2) genes (rs4641528 and rs10879355) in the genomic DNA of 383 patients with stroke demonstrated that post-stroke depression (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.039 to 5.631; P<0.05) and emotional incontinence (95% CI, 1.029 to 11.678; P<0.05) were related to the TPH2 rs4641528 C allele. However, PSA was not related to any of these factors. Instead, it was related to MAO-A polymorphisms associated with low MAO-A activity [9]. This observation is in line with a previous study that showed polymorphic variation in the MAO-A gene was related to dysfunctional central nervous system serotonergic responsivity, which in turn results in individual variability in aggressiveness and impulsivity [24]. Although the detailed mechanism linking PSA to genetic disturbances remains uninvestigated, these heterogeneous genetic characteristics may partly explain the reason why a particular group of patients exhibits PSA among patients with brain lesions at a similar location.
One of the limitations of PSA research is the rare use of control participants (i.e., participants without stroke). A study by Santos et al. [11] found no differences between the frequency of anger in patients with stroke (35%) and in those with acute coronary syndrome (38%). This observation contradicts the theory that PSA is directly caused by brain lesions. As anger is considered a risk factor for stroke [25,26], the anger observed in patients with stroke may not be a real “post-stroke” anger. However, previous studies using controls are too rare to obtain a definitive conclusion. Patients with PSA stated that their anger after stroke increased when compared to their pre-stroke anger [7,9]. Moreover, a long-term follow-up study showed a gradual decrease in PSA intensity over time [17]. Thus, the notion that anger is a result of stroke seems to be reasonable [27]. PSA appears to be a multi-factorial phenomenon related to neurochemical change secondary to brain damage, reactive behavioral changes associated with functional deficits or unfavorable environments, psychiatric manifestation of VCI, and possibly, genetic polymorphisms involving MAO-A activity.

Impact on patients’ quality of life and caregiver burden

The impact of PSA on patients’ clinical outcomes and QOL has rarely been studied. One study [2] investigated the association of PSA with patients’ QOL and found that patients with PSA had lower QOL total scores and Personality Changes and Social Role scores than those without PSA. They further categorized PSA into “passive aggression” and “combined passive and active aggression” and found that the combined passive and active aggression group had significantly lower Energy and Thinking scores on the QOL questionnaire than the passive aggression group. Another study showed that patients’ anger was one of the challenging items for caregivers of stroke survivors [28].
Another study involving patients with CADASIL [3] assessed QOL using the stroke-specific QOL scale (49 items comprising 12 domains) [29], while caregivers’ burden was evaluated using the Sense of Competence Questionnaire (27 items) [30]. Considering the small number of patients, emotional incontinence was combined with PSA and categorized as “non-depressive emotional disturbances” (NDED). Similar to depression, NDED negatively affected caregivers’ burden. Although QOL scores were low in both patients with depression and in those with NDED, the difference was statistically significant only in patients with depression. This indicates that although NDED was associated with poor QOL, its impact was relatively mild compared to that of depression. It seems that patients’ anger may occasionally trouble their caregivers and increase their burden. However, unlike depression, however, NDED is usually episodic and not associated with persistent, inherent psychological problems, which may explain the relatively weaker influence of NDED on a patient’s subjective QOL assessment. Nevertheless, these results should be interpreted cautiously because the authors had examined NDED (combination of emotional incontinence and anger) and not PSA alone.


Antidepressants including fluoxetine [31] and citalopram [32] are beneficial in treating aggressive behavior in patients with personality disorders and dementia, respectively. However, pharmacological trials have rarely been conducted in patients with PSA. One study [10] showed that compared to the placebo, antidepressants, including fluoxetine (up to 40 mg/day) or nortriptyline (up to 100 mg/day), did not significantly lower anger scores. However, the patient number was too small (13 in placebo and seven in treatment group) to draw reliable conclusions. In another study, Choi-Kwon et al. [8] enrolled 152 patients with post-stroke depression, emotional incontinence, or PSA, wherein the PSA levels were assessed using the Spielberger Trait Anger Scale. Patients were randomized to receive either fluoxetine 20 mg/day or a placebo for 3 months, with follow-up evaluations conducted at 1, 3, and 6 months after treatment initiation. The primary outcome was the PSA score at each follow-up assessment, while the secondary outcome was the percentage change in the scores. In patients with PSA (n=95), the demographic characteristics and mean PSA score at enrollment did not differ between the fluoxetine and placebo groups. At 3 months, the mean PSA score was significantly lower in the fluoxetine group than in the placebo group (P<0.01). However, after the discontinuation of the study medication (at 3 months), the PSA score tended to increase in the fluoxetine group. The percentage changes in PSA scores were also significantly greater at 3 months after treatment.
In another study, Kim et al. [33] randomized 478 admitted patients with ischemic stroke (<21 days after stroke onset) to receive a placebo (n=237) or escitalopram (10 mg/day, n=241). The primary endpoint was the frequency of moderate or severe depressive symptoms (Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale score ≥16) at 3 months post-stroke. The effect on PSA (measured using the Spielberger Trait Anger Scale) was one of the secondary endpoints. According to the prespecified protocol, efficacy endpoints were primarily analyzed with the full analysis set (including all randomly assigned participants who took at least one dose of the study medication and underwent at least one primary endpoint assessment). The results showed that the mean anger score measured at 3 months post-stroke was significantly lower in the escitalopram group than in the placebo group (20.2 vs. 21.3, P=0.035). Escitalopram was generally well tolerated, although diarrhea incidence was more common in the escitalopram group (4%) than in the placebo group (1%).
Thus, SSRIs are generally tolerable and effective in reducing PSA severity and can be considered first-line drugs for PSA. Additionally, SSRI use in patients with emotional disturbances was found to improve their QOL [34]. Other studies showed that beta-adrenergic antagonists [35] and lithium [36] may reduce aggressiveness in patients with brain injury. Therefore, these drugs may be used for patients who do not respond satisfactorily to SSRIs. However, it should be noted that no clinical trials of these drugs have been conducted on patients with stroke.
In the acute stage of stroke, neuroleptics (either haloperidol or atypical neuroleptics) may be used in patients with severe aggressive behavior [37] to prevent harm to the patients and surrounding people. The dose can be titrated according to the controllability of aggression and intensity of adverse effects. Adverse cardiovascular effects and the possibility of lowering the seizure threshold should also be considered in patients with stroke. After controlling for acute aggressive behavior, the dose should be gradually reduced and eventually discontinued.
The role of psychiatric or psychological counseling in PSA management remains unclear. One study showed that patients with stroke often have anger that is provoked by family members or colleagues [7], while another study [17] found a relation between the lack of social support and PSA in the chronic stage of stroke. These observations suggest that successful PSA management may have to include psychological intervention or proper education for patients and caregivers. However, evidence of the benefits of such non-phamarcoloical therapy for PSA is currently extremely low [38].

Anger as a cause of stroke

Anger as a risk factor for stroke

In 1999, Everson et al. [25] followed Finnish male patients for 8.3 years and found that participants with the highest level of expressed anger had double the risk of stroke than those with the lowest level of expressed anger (Table 2). In another study involving 13,851 men and women (aged 48 to 67 years) from white and black populations who were followed up for 6.4 years, trait anger was reported to be modestly associated with stroke risk. Additionally, heterogeneity was observed in the effects of age and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) level. Although anger traits were significantly associated with stroke risk among young (≤60 years) participants and those with high HDL-C levels, no such association was found among older participants or those with lower HDL-C levels [26]. Another large epidemiological study (n=10,366) reported a similar result, wherein unhealthy aggression was associated with an increased likelihood of stroke incidence. The study additionally found that pathological levels of aggression were linked to hypertension, suggesting the contribution of hypertension to the association between aggression and stroke [39]. In contrast, one study reported that anger expression assessed by the Spielberger Anger-Out Expression Scale had a protective effect on stroke occurrence after following male professionals with a high educational level for an average of 2 years. The relative stroke risk was 0.42 (95% CI, 0.20 to 0.88) when comparing the men with higher anger-out scores with those with lower scores [40].
The discrepancy in the results might have been due to differences in the socioeconomic status (SES) or regional cultural/environmental factors. A recent meta-analysis found no significant association between anger and hostility and stroke risk [41]. However, after the exclusion of male professionals with high SES, anger significantly contributed to an increased stroke risk (hazard ratio, 1.30; 95% CI, 1.06 to 1.59). Thus, anger and hostility may be associated with stroke only in people with low SES. Additionally, the effect of anger may be influenced by urbanicity. A recent prospective study in Japan followed 5,936 residents of urban and rural communities (age range, 40 to 79 years) for an average of 16.6 years. The mean anger expression scores were similar between urban and rural residents, and 312 patients developed a stroke. Among urban residents, anger expression was positively associated with stroke risk (hazard ratio, 1.27; 95% CI, 1.05 to 1.54). In contrast, no association was found among rural residents (hazard ratio, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.85 to 1.09) [42]. Although SES and urbanicity may be interrelated, previous studies have not examined this aspect. Therefore, further studies are required to examine whether SES and urbanicity are independent factors that modify the effects of anger.

Anger as a triggering factor for stroke

Anger has been suggested as a triggering factor for stroke (Table 2). A hospital-based cross-sectional study in India assessed 11 potential trigger factors, including recent psychological stress, alcohol abuse, infection, drug abuse, sexual activity, and anger. Triggering factors were detected in 128 (44.2%) of the total 290 patients (46.4% had ischemic stroke and 36.4% had hemorrhagic stroke). Anger assessed <2 hours before stroke onset was identified in 12 (4.1%) patients [43]. Unfortunately, the result was difficult to interpret because of the lack of control participants.
Case-crossover studies can overcome this problem by adding more credibility to the study results. In these studies, patients with acute stroke were asked whether they were angry or emotionally upset immediately before the stroke symptom onset. Additionally, anger during the corresponding hours of the previous day was assessed. Although this method has limitations in that only alert and communicable patients can be enrolled, it has advantage because each individual can serve as his/her own comparator. Using this method, a study of 200 patients with acute stroke compared the anger intensity during a 2-hour hazard period prior to stroke onset with the intensity at the same period during the preceding day. The results showed an odds ratio (OR) of 14.0 (95% CI, 2.8 to 253.6) [44]. INTERSTROKE investigators also conducted a case-control study involving 13,462 patients with first stroke from 32 countries. They adopted a case-crossover approach to determine whether a trigger within 1 hour of symptom onset (case period) versus the same time on the previous day (control period) was associated with acute stroke. A total of 1,233 (9.2%) patients were angry or emotionally upset during the case period. Anger or being emotionally upset in the case period was associated with increased odds of all stroke (OR, 1.37; 99% CI, 1.15 to 1.64), ischemic stroke (OR, 1.22; 99% CI, 1.00 to 1.49), and intracerebral hemorrhage (OR, 2.05; 99% CI, 1.40 to 2.99). No modifying effects of region, prior cardiovascular disease, risk factors, cardiovascular medications, time, or symptom onset day were detected [45].


Several hypotheses have been proposed to explain the relationship between anger and stroke. First, an individual with an angry temperament may constantly have a high level of physiological activation, particularly sympathetic activation. This can lead to endothelial damage, increased vascular rigidity, and elevated blood pressure. A previous study reported that chronic anger suppression in men may increase hypertension risk, which predisposes individuals to develop cardiovascular disease [46]. Second, anger may result in increased cortisol release along with activation of the hypothalamo-hypophyseal axis. This may result in the disruption of vulnerable plaques, especially among patients with other risk factors [47]. Finally, anger may result in increased inflammatory and pro-thrombotic responses, thereby causing increased platelet aggregation and plasma viscosity and decreased fibrinolytic potential [48].

Possible interventions

As personality traits are difficult to change, the purpose of an intervention is not to change one’s personality, but to encourage intervention efforts. As described above, a prospective cohort study showed that anger expression was associated with increased stroke risk among urban residents but not their rural counterparts [42]. Additionally, the authors reported that improving perceived social support mitigated stroke risk associated with anger [49]. These results suggest that living in less stressful conditions with proper social support may positively modify the effect of anger on stroke. However, further studies are required to obtain more substantial evidence for this strategy.


PSA is prevalent during the acute and subacute stages of stroke. Thus, along with depression, PSA appears to be one of the main emotional symptoms observed in patients with stroke. PSA is associated with neurological deficits, depression, and emotional incontinence. Although the study results are heterogeneous, lesions involving the frontal-lenticular-brainstem pathway appear to be involved. Considering this, PSA seems to be (at least in part) related to neurochemical (e.g., serotonin) changes secondary to brain damage. However, patients’ frustration associated with their functional deficits and hostile environments and genetic predisposition may also play a role in PSA development. Antidepressants, particularly SSRIs, are considered the management of choice. The recognition of PSA is important not only because it deteriorates patients’ QOL and increases caregivers’ burden, but also because it is treatable.
However, several limitations need to be addressed. First, a standardized method for diagnosing or measuring PSA severity has not yet been established. Second, in most PSA studies, patients with severe aphasia or cognitive impairment were excluded. Thus, PSA prevalence is probably underestimated. Third, data from different continents (e.g., Europe, North America, and Asia) may generate further confounders because of the differences in the healthcare system across countries. Finally, studies involving large patient populations, appropriate controls, and well-designed clinical trials are rare. Thus, further research considering these limitations is needed to improve the understanding and management of PSA.
Here, we have discussed that studies have shown that anger is a risk or triggering factor for stroke. However, it remains unclear whether the negative effects of anger are independent from the modification of known risk factors, including hypertension. There have been suggestions that the negative effect of anger may be modified by patients’ social status and environment. Therefore, more research is needed to clarify the role of anger as a risk factor for stroke and to develop strategies to prevent stroke by appropriately managing anger.


The authors have no financial conflicts of interest.

Figure 1.
Flow diagram depicting the selection process of the studies included in this review.
Table 1.
Summary of the studies on post-stroke anger
Study Terminology Stroke subtype Number Time from stroke onset Tools Definition of anger Prevalence Associated factors
Paradiso et al. (1996) [19] USA Aggressive behavior CI and ICH 309 Mean, 14 days Structured interview Patients who experienced feeling of anger or reported that hey had quarrel, shout, hit people, break things 6% Young age Depression
Cognitive impairment
Less impaired daily living activities
Lesion in left hemisphere
Proximal to the frontal cortex
Kim et al. (2002) [7] South Korea Inability to control CI and ICH 145 2-13 mo 10-Item Spielberger Trait Anger Scale 1. Post-stroke anger score > prestroke anger 32% Motor dysfunction
Anger or aggression 2. Patient felt that he/she develops PSA Dysathria
3. At least one relative agrees with (2) Emotional incontinence
Chan et al. (2006) [10] USA Aggressive behavior CI and ICH 92 <6 mo Present State Examination Positive ratings on 1 or more of the following 5 items: 25% Anterior edge of lesion
1. Patient acknowledges showing anger by shouting or quarreling (1 point), or by hitting people or throwing or breaking things (2 points) Closer to the frontal pole
2. Discrete episode of violent behavior that had an impact on others (e.g., body injury) (2 points) or more than 1 episode of violence (3 points) Depression
3. Hostile behavior to examiner through anger, irritability, or overt aggression (1 point) Anxiety
4. Agitation during an interview (1 point) Cognitive impairment
5. Gross excitement/violence during interview (1 point)
Santos et al. (2006) [11] Portugal Anger CI, ICH, and SAH 202 ≤4 days 8 Items from three psychiatric scales Catastrophic Reaction Scale Mania Rating Scale and Comprehensive Psychopathophysiological Rating Scale If the patient scored at least 1 point in any of those items 35%
Choi-Kwon et al. (2013) [9] South Korea Anger proneness CI 508 Acute stage 10-Item Spielberger Trait Anger Scale 1. Post-stroke anger score > prestroke anger 15% Presence of previous stroke NIHSS score low MAO-A activity
Scale 2. Patient felt that he/she develops PSA
3. At least one relative agrees with (2)
Noh et al. (2014) [3] South Korea Anger proneness CADASIL patients 23 ND 10-Item Spielberger Trait Anger Scale 1. Post-stroke anger score > prestroke anger 22%
2. Patient felt that he/she develops PSA
3. At least one relative agrees with (2)
Lau et al. (2017) [2] Hong Kong Aggression CI 324 3 mo Interview with a caregiver with Neuropsychiatric Inventory-Carers The screening question followed by 8 further questions (see the text) 19% Diabetes
Distress Version 12 domains: delusion, hallucinations, agitation/aggression, depression/dysphoria, anxiety, elation/euphoria, apathy/indifference, disinhibition, irritability/liability, motor disturbance, night time behaviors, and appetite Depression
Kwon et al. (2021) [17] South Korea Anger CI and ICH 222 Acute stage 10-Item Spielberger Trait Anger Simply assessed average anger score 22.9 at admission
6 mo and 5 yr 21.6 at 6 mo
16.2 at 5 yr
CI, cerebral infarction; ICH, intracerebral hemorrhage; PSA, post-stroke anger; SAH, subarachnoid hemorrhage; NIHSS, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale; MAO-A, monoamine oxidase A; CADASIL, cerebral autosomal dominant arteriopathy with subcortical infarcts and leukoencephalopathy; ND, not described.
Table 2.
Summary of the studies on anger as a risk /triggering factor for stroke
Study Terminology Stroke subtype Age (yr) Patient numbers (cases) Follow-up Tools OR (95% CI)/Remarks Covariates
Anger as a risk factor
Everson et al. (1999) [25] Finland Anger out/in/control Incident stroke 53.0 2,074 (64) 8.3 yr Spielberger Anger Expression Scales 2.03 (1.05-3.94) Age, BMI, SBP, smoking, alcohol consumption, SES, HDL, LDL, fibrinogen, prevalent diabetes, use of antihypertensive medication
6.87 (1.50-31.4)/history of IHD
Williams et al (2002) [26] USA Trait anger Incident stroke 48-67 13,851 (257) 6.4 yr 10-Item Spielberger Trait Anger Scale 2.82 (1.64-5.22)/≤60 years old Sex, race/ethnicity
2.86 (1.56-5.25)/HDL >47 Age, sex, race/ethnicity
Eng et al. (2003) [40] USA Anger out Incident stroke 61.9 23,522 (57) 2.0 yr Spielberger Anger Out Expression Scales 0.42 (0.20-0.88) Age, smoking history, alcohol intake, BMI, physical activity, hypertension, high serum cholesterol, diabetes, history of MI in parent aged less than 60, beta blocker use, antidepressant use, tranquilizer use, routine physical exam in last 2 years, energy-adjusted intakes of total fat, saturated fat, folate, and fiber, multivitamin and vitamin E supplement use, employment status, Berkman-Syme Social network Index
McCloskey et al. (2010) [39] USA Unhealthy aggression (IED) Stroke 35.7 (IED) 10,366 (204) Collaborative Psychiatric Epidemiology Surveys (lifetime IED status) 2.01 (1.29-3.14) Age, gender, race, marital status, education, smoking status, BMI, history of alcohol abuse or dependence, history of other drug abuse or dependence, previous accidents or injuries
42.9 (control)
Tezuka et al. (2020) [42] Japan Anger in/out CI, ICH, SAH, unclassified stroke 58.3 (urban) 5,936 (204) 16.6 yr Spielberger Anger In/ Out Expression Scales 1.27 (1.05-1.54)/urban residents Age, sex, smoking, alcohol, BMI, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, hyperlipidemia
56.9 (rural) 0.96 (0.68-1.34)/rural residents
Tezuka et al. (2021) [49] Japan Anger in/out CI, ICH, SAH, unclassified stroke 59.4 (low PSS) 1,806 (51) 18.8 yr Spielberger Anger In/ Out Expression Scales 1.43 (1.13-1.82)/low PSS Age, sex, smoking, alcohol, BMI, SBP, antihypertensive medication use, diabetes mellitus, hyperlipidemia
55.1 (high PSS) 0.83 (0.49-1.40)/high PSS
Anger as a triggering factor
Koton et al. (2004) [44] Israel Anger CI, TIA 68.3 200 (200) 2-Hour hazard period, 2-hour control period Onset Anger Scale 14.0 (2.8-253.6)
Sharma et al. (2015) [43] India Anger CI, ICH, SAH 54.1 290 (290) Onset Anger Scale Anger (prevalence of 4.1%) is one of the triggering factors associated with higher NIHSS scores (CI), and higher hematoma volume (ICH, SAH)
Smyth et al. (2022) [45] 32 countries including Canada Anger, upset CI, ICH, SAH 62.2 13,462 (13,462) 1 Hour before the onset of symptoms and during the corresponding 1 hour period on the previous day A dichotomous question of ‘Were you angry or emotionally upset?’ OR (99% CI)
1.37 (1.15-1.64)/all stroke
1.22 (1.00-1.49)/CI
2.05 (1.40-2.99)/ICH
OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval; IHD, ischemic heart disease; BMI, body mass index; SBP, systolic blood pressure; SES, socioeconomic status; HDL, high density lipoprotein; LDL, low density lipoprotein; MI, myocardial infarction; IED, intermittent explosive disorder; ICH, intracerebral hemorrhage; SAH, subarachnoid hemorrhage; PSS, perceived social support; TIA, transient ischemic attack; NIHSS, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale.


1. Kim JS. Post-stroke mood and emotional disturbances: pharmacological therapy based on mechanisms. J Stroke 2016;18:244-255.
crossref pmid pmc pdf
2. Lau CG, Tang WK, Liu XX, Liang HJ, Liang Y, Wong A, et al. Poststroke agitation and aggression and social quality of life: a case control study. Top Stroke Rehabil 2017;24:126-133.
crossref pmid
3. Noh SM, Chung SJ, Kim KK, Kang DW, Lim YM, Kwon SU, et al. Emotional disturbance in CADASIL: its impact on quality of life and caregiver burden. Cerebrovasc Dis 2014;37:188-194.
crossref pmid pdf
4. Kowalska K, Droś J, Mazurek M, Pasińska P, Gorzkowska A, Klimkowicz-Mrowiec A. Delirium post-stroke: short- and long-term effect on depression, anxiety, apathy and aggression (research study-part of PROPOLIS Study). J Clin Med 2020;9:2232.
crossref pmid pmc
5. Gainotti G. Emotional behavior and hemispheric side of the lesion. Cortex 1972;8:41-55.
crossref pmid
6. Carota A, Rossetti AO, Karapanayiotides T, Bogousslavsky J. Catastrophic reaction in acute stroke: a reflex behavior in aphasic patients. Neurology 2001;57:1902-1905.
crossref pmid
7. Kim JS, Choi S, Kwon SU, Seo YS. Inability to control anger or aggression after stroke. Neurology 2002;58:1106-1108.
crossref pmid
8. Choi-Kwon S, Han SW, Kwon SU, Kang DW, Choi JM, Kim JS. Fluoxetine treatment in poststroke depression, emotional incontinence, and anger proneness: a double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Stroke 2006;37:156-161.
crossref pmid
9. Choi-Kwon S, Han K, Cho KH, Choi S, Suh M, Nah HW, et al. Factors associated with post-stroke anger proneness in ischaemic stroke patients. Eur J Neurol 2013;20:1305-1310.
crossref pmid
10. Chan KL, Campayo A, Moser DJ, Arndt S, Robinson RG. Aggressive behavior in patients with stroke: association with psychopathology and results of antidepressant treatment on aggression. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2006;87:793-798.
crossref pmid
11. Santos CO, Caeiro L, Ferro JM, Albuquerque R, Luísa Figueira M. Anger, hostility and aggression in the first days of acute stroke. Eur J Neurol 2006;13:351-358.
crossref pmid
12. Starkstein SE, Fedoroff JP, Price TR, Leiguarda R, Robinson RG. Catastrophic reaction after cerebrovascular lesions: frequency, correlates, and validation of a scale. J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci 1993;5:189-194.
crossref pmid
13. Montgomery SA, Asberg M. A new depression scale designed to be sensitive to change. Br J Psychiatry 1979;134:382-389.
crossref pmid
14. Asberg M, Montgomery SA, Perris C, Schalling D, Sedvall G. A comprehensive psychopathological rating scale. Acta Psychiatr Scand Suppl 1978;271:5-27.

15. Annoni JM, Staub F, Bruggimann L, Gramigna S, Bogousslavsky J. Emotional disturbances after stroke. Clin Exp Hypertens 2006;28:243-249.
crossref pmid
16. Huang HC, Huang LK, Hu CJ, Chang CH, Lee HC, Chi NF, et al. The mediating effect of psychological distress on functional dependence in stroke patients. J Clin Nurs 2014;23:3533-3543.
crossref pmid pdf
17. Kwon B, Lee EJ, Park S, Lee JS, Lee MH, Jeong D, et al. Longterm changes in post-stroke depression, emotional incontinence, and anger. J Stroke 2021;23:263-272.
crossref pmid pmc pdf
18. Garcia-Rudolph A, Laxe S, Saurí J, Bernabeu Guitart M. Stroke survivors on Twitter: sentiment and topic analysis from a gender perspective. J Med Internet Res 2019;21:e14077.
crossref pmid pmc
19. Paradiso S, Robinson RG, Arndt S. Self-reported aggressive behavior in patients with stroke. J Nerv Ment Dis 1996;184:746-753.
crossref pmid
20. Tang WK, Liu XX, Liang H, Chen YK, Chu WC, Ahuja AT, et al. Location of acute infarcts and agitation and aggression in stroke. J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci 2017;29:172-178.
crossref pmid
21. Toscano M, Viganò A, Puledda F, Verzina A, Rocco A, Lenzi GL, et al. Serotonergic correlation with anger and aggressive behavior in acute stroke patients: an intensity dependence of auditory evoked potentials (IDAP) study. Eur Neurol 2014;72:186-192.
crossref pmid pdf
22. Gupta M, Dasgupta A, Khwaja GA, Chowdhury D, Patidar Y, Batra A. Behavioural and psychological symptoms in poststroke vascular cognitive impairment. Behav Neurol 2014;2014:430128.
crossref pmid pmc pdf
23. Ko M, Choi-Kwon S, Jun SE, Kim JH, Cho KH, Nah HW, et al. Poststroke emotional disturbances and a tryptophan hydroxylase 2 gene polymorphism. Brain Behav 2018;8:e00892.
crossref pmid pmc pdf
24. Manuck SB, Flory JD, Ferrell RE, Mann JJ, Muldoon MF. A regulatory polymorphism of the monoamine oxidase-A gene may be associated with variability in aggression, impulsivity, and central nervous system serotonergic responsivity. Psychiatry Res 2000;95:9-23.
crossref pmid
25. Everson SA, Kaplan GA, Goldberg DE, Lakka TA, Sivenius J, Salonen JT. Anger expression and incident stroke: prospective evidence from the Kuopio ischemic heart disease study. Stroke 1999;30:523-528.
crossref pmid
26. Williams JE, Nieto FJ, Sanford CP, Couper DJ, Tyroler HA. The association between trait anger and incident stroke risk: the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study. Stroke 2002;33:13-19.
crossref pmid
27. Rosa PB, Orquiza B, Rocha FB, Donadel RW, Diniz RP, Beloni TM, et al. Anger and stroke: a potential association that deserves serious consideration. Acta Neuropsychiatr 2016;28:346-351.
crossref pmid
28. Choi-Kwon S, Mitchell PH, Veith R, Teri L, Buzaitis A, Cain KC, et al. Comparing perceived burden for Korean and American informal caregivers of stroke survivors. Rehabil Nurs 2009;34:141-150.
crossref pmid pmc
29. Williams LS, Weinberger M, Harris LE, Clark DO, Biller J. Development of a stroke-specific quality of life scale. Stroke 1999;30:1362-1369.
crossref pmid
30. Scholte op Reimer WJ, de Haan RJ, Pijnenborg JM, Limburg M, van den Bos GA. Assessment of burden in partners of stroke patients with the sense of competence questionnaire. Stroke 1998;29:373-379.
crossref pmid
31. Coccaro EF, Kavoussi RJ. Fluoxetine and impulsive aggressive behavior in personality-disordered subjects. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1997;54:1081-1088.
crossref pmid
32. Pollock BG, Mulsant BH, Rosen J, Mazumdar S, Blakesley RE, Houck PR, et al. A double-blind comparison of citalopram and risperidone for the treatment of behavioral and psychotic symptoms associated with dementia. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry 2007;15:942-952.
crossref pmid
33. Kim JS, Lee EJ, Chang DI, Park JH, Ahn SH, Cha JK, et al. Efficacy of early administration of escitalopram on depressive and emotional symptoms and neurological dysfunction after stroke: a multicentre, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled study. Lancet Psychiatry 2017;4:33-41.
crossref pmid
34. Choi-Kwon S, Choi J, Kwon SU, Kang DW, Kim JS. Fluoxetine improves the quality of life in patients with poststroke emotional disturbances. Cerebrovasc Dis 2008;26:266-271.
crossref pmid pdf
35. Fleminger S, Greenwood RJ, Oliver DL. Pharmacological management for agitation and aggression in people with acquired brain injury. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2003;1:CD003299.
crossref pmid
36. Glenn MB, Wroblewski B, Parziale J, Levine L, Whyte J, Rosenthal M. Lithium carbonate for aggressive behavior or affective instability in ten brain-injured patients. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 1989;68:221-226.
crossref pmid
37. Ferro JM, Caeiro L, Figueira ML. Neuropsychiatric sequelae of stroke. Nat Rev Neurol 2016;12:269-280.
crossref pmid pdf
38. Ferro JM, Santos AC. Emotions after stroke: a narrative update. Int J Stroke 2020;15:256-267.
crossref pmid pdf
39. McCloskey MS, Kleabir K, Berman ME, Chen EY, Coccaro EF. Unhealthy aggression: intermittent explosive disorder and adverse physical health outcomes. Health Psychol 2010;29:324-332.
crossref pmid
40. Eng PM, Fitzmaurice G, Kubzansky LD, Rimm EB, Kawachi I. Anger expression and risk of stroke and coronary heart disease among male health professionals. Psychosom Med 2003;65:100-110.
crossref pmid
41. Chen H, Zhang B, Xue W, Li J, Li Y, Fu K, et al. Anger, hostility and risk of stroke: a meta-analysis of cohort studies. J Neurol 2019;266:1016-1026.
crossref pmid pdf
42. Tezuka K, Kubota Y, Ohira T, Shimizu Y, Yamagishi K, Umesawa M, et al. Anger expression and the risk of cardiovascular disease among urban and rural Japanese residents: the Circulatory Risk in Communities Study. Psychosom Med 2020;82:215-223.
crossref pmid
43. Sharma A, Prasad K, Padma MV, Tripathi M, Bhatia R, Singh MB, et al. Prevalence of triggering factors in acute stroke: hospital-based observational cross-sectional study. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis 2015;24:337-347.
crossref pmid
44. Koton S, Tanne D, Bornstein NM, Green MS. Triggering risk factors for ischemic stroke: a case-crossover study. Neurology 2004;63:2006-2010.
crossref pmid
45. Smyth A, O’Donnell M, Hankey GJ, Rangarajan S, Lopez-Jaramillo P, Xavier D, et al. Anger or emotional upset and heavy physical exertion as triggers of stroke: the INTERSTROKE study. Eur Heart J 2022;43:202-209.
crossref pmid pdf
46. Ohira T. Psychological distress and cardiovascular disease: the Circulatory Risk in Communities Study (CIRCS). J Epidemiol 2010;20:185-191.
crossref pmid pmc
47. Moons WG, Eisenberger NI, Taylor SE. Anger and fear responses to stress have different biological profiles. Brain Behav Immun 2010;24:215-219.
crossref pmid
48. Girard D, Tardif JC, Boisclair Demarble J, D’Antono B. Trait hostility and acute inflammatory responses to stress in the laboratory. PLoS One 2016;11:e0156329.
crossref pmid pmc
49. Tezuka K, Kubota Y, Ohira T, Muraki I, Hayama-Terada M, Shimizu Y, et al. Impact of perceived social support on the association between anger expression and the risk of stroke: the Circulatory Risk in Communities Study (CIRCS). J Epidemiol 2021;Jun. 26. [Epub]. https://doi.org/10.2188/jea.JE20200607.
crossref pmid


Browse all articles >

Editorial Office
Department of Neurology, Asan Medical Center,Ulsan University College of Medicine
88, Olympic-ro 43-gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul 05505, Korea
Submission, status and progress, etc ⟫ E-mail: editor@j-stroke.org
Website and system ⟫ E-mail: journal@m2community.co.kr
Publishing company ⟫ E-mail: jin@ijpnc.com
Developed in M2PI
Copyright © 2022 by Korean Stroke Society.
Close layer
prev next