As one of the most devastating neurological diseases, stroke is a leading cause of mortality and adult disability worldwide, especially in low- and middle-income regions [1]. It accounts for 10% of disability-adjusted life-years lost and 5% of deaths annually [2]. With the increasing global burden of stroke, identifying the underlying risks and protective factors is crucial for stroke prevention. Previous observational studies have reported that 90% of strokes are attributed to modifiable risk factors [3]. However, observational data are limited by confounding and reverse causality, leading to limited power to identify causal associations. The method of Mendelian randomization (MR) has become a powerful tool for investigating the causal relationships between risk factors and disease using observational data [4]. MR studies use genetic information as instrumental variables to implement causal relationships, and it can be regarded as analogous to a randomized controlled study [5].

The concept of exposome was first proposed to set a high-throughput method to elucidate the relationships between all exposures and a disease [6]. Exposome consist of the entire set of environmental exposures, ranging from individual-level (e.g., education, cigarette smoking, exercise, and hypertension) to exogenous-level exposures (e.g., air pollution and socioeconomic status) [7]. In parallel to -omics (e.g., genomics, metabolomics), exposome superseded the characteristics of exposures “one by one.” Therefore, the stroke exposome concept can be used to comprehensively detect the causal factors of stroke at the omics level, while conventional epidemiological risk factor studies focusing on one or several exposures at a time may miss some causal and preventive factors. We conducted exposome-wide association studies (ExWAS) to evaluate the potential causal effects of multiple exposures on stroke via the MR method based on the concept of exposome [8].

In this study, we aimed to assess the causal associations between exposure (including exogenous and endogenous factors) and ischemic stroke, as well as its subtypes (i.e., large-artery atherosclerotic disease [LAD], cardioembolic stroke [CE], and small vessel disease [SVD]). We conducted an ExWAS using the MR method to detect possible exposure-stroke associations in the hope of preventing stroke. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to use the MR method to evaluate the causal relationship between exposure and stroke.

In this MR study of exposure and stroke, we identified traditional causal mediators for ischemic stroke (higher SBP, DBP, PP, AF, and diabetes), LAD (higher SBP, PP, diabetes, and CAD), CE (AF), and SVD (higher SBP, DBP, and diabetes). Of note, we found education attainment, length of education, math classes taken, and cognitive performance as novel causal exposures of ischemic stroke.

Our study indicates that education is a novel protective causal factor for AIS. Whether education was associated with stroke was inconclusive before our current study. A large Australian prospective cohort study reported that low education was associated with increased stroke risk (adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 1.41; 95% CI, 1.16 to 1.71; and HR, 1.25; 95% CI, 1.07 to 1.46, for women and men, respectively) [30]. Similarly, a large cohort study following patients up for 26 years indicated that educational attainment had an inverse dose-dependent relationship with cerebrovascular disease. However, the first National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, an epidemiological longitudinal study, suggested that the association between educational attainment and stroke was not statistically significant [31]. These observational studies did not provide solid evidence for the stroke prevention effect of higher education. In this study, we used a genetic instrument to simulate a randomized controlled study that attempted to reveal the relationship between education and stroke. Consistent with previous studies, higher education attainment was found to be associated with a lower risk of stroke. Thus, strategies that diminish education inequalities are of great importance for stroke prevention.

The causal risk factors identified by this exposome MR study were consistent with previously well-known traditional risk factors for stroke (hypertension, diabetes, coronary artery atherosclerosis, and AF) [32]. Furthermore, the casual exposures of its subtypes were also consistent with conventional conception, and thus validated our exposome MR method.

Our investigation has methodological strengths. First, we used a high-throughput, data-driven approach to screen potential causal exposures at the omics level. We evaluated as many exposures as possible, leveraging the large sample size and enriched information from the UK Biobank. Compared with conventional observational studies or randomized clinical trials that can only appraise one or several risk factors, we evaluated thousands of exposures in one study. Second, the MR study could be considered as a randomization study. Leveraging genetics, two-sample MR could be used to infer the causality of exposures and outcomes. Furthermore, the identified exposures through the first screening step were replicated by the most recent and largest GWAS, providing validation for the exposome MR study.

This study has some limitations. First, the association model of GWAS of exposures was a least-squares linear model, regardless of whether the exposure variables were continuous or binary. The binary traits were better suited for the logistic model, and the linear model may create biases in the beta coefficients. Thus, we noticed that the estimation of associations strongly deviated to binary or ordinal variables. However, dealing with large-scale data with different regression models would result in unnecessary complexity. Furthermore, the tendency of the causal relationship could also be detected using the linear model. Importantly, our replication study confirmed the exposome MR results. Second, we detected causal exposures of stroke and stroke subtypes. However, the dosage effects of risk exposures on stroke have not been investigated. The MR method focused on explaining the causal relationship between exposure and outcome. The dosage effects of exposure should be investigated further. Additionally, this study detected causal exposure by using MR between the exposome and stroke, but we did not weigh multiple exposures using this method. Weighing the risks of the detected factors is required in the future. Further research on the polygenic risk score is needed to explore the relationship between genetics, environmental exposures, and outcomes in a large longitudinal cohort. Finally, we identified several modifiable risk factors for stroke and stroke subtypes. Our study provides an interventional treatment target. Optimal medication and drug compliance are of great importance in controlling these risk factors.

We screened the causal exposures of stroke at the omics level using a MR study. Traditional risk factors such as hypertension, diabetes, CAD, and AF were confirmed as causative relationships that contributed to all stroke and stroke subtypes. Educational attainment can reduce the incidence of AIS. Our findings suggest that improving the education level and managing modifiable causal factors are essential for stroke prevention.