We would like to congratulate the authors for their well-drafted article published in the May 2016 issue entitled “Non-Vitamin K Oral Anticoagulants in Stroke Patients: Practical Issues [1]”. We read the article with interest and would like to humbly highlight few of our observations and comments from our experience.

The concept of “1-3-6-12 day rule” was recently mentioned as a consensus approach for recommendations for anticoagulation in patients with cerebral ischemic event, either transient ischemic attack or stroke [2]. As mentioned by the authors, the initiation of anticoagulation in these patients depends on various factors. However, the decision to initiate or restart the anticoagulation primarily pivots around the size of infarction delineated by neuroimaging. Recent advent of novel imaging techniques has been critical in the success in stroke community [3]. Risk of cerebral hemorrhagic transformation is majorly related to the size and age of the cerebral infarct. In our clinical practice, we tend to prefer following simplified, yet logical algorithm to approach patients with recent cerebral ischemic event who have a strong indication for anticoagulation (Table 1): A) No infarction or clinically diagnosed transient ischemic attack: anticoagulation could be started immediately. B) Infarct size ≤1.5 cm diameter → anticoagulation could be started in 2 days, C) Infarct size between 1.6 cm-3 cm → anticoagulation to be initiated in 4-5 days, D) Infarct size ≥3 cm: anticoagulation could be started at day 7. Any patients with hemorrhagic conversion or large parenchymal bleeds should be reimaged to confirm the stability of bleed. For cases with mild hemorrhagic infarction (HI-1/2), anticoagulation could be started in 7-10 days, while more severe cerebral hemorrhage including parenchymal hematomas, subdural or subarachnoid hemorrhage require a minimum waiting time of at least 2-4 weeks depending on urgency of anticoagulation in individual cases.

Authors tend to describe the terminology of mild stroke as patients who present with National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) ≤8 in their article. However, we beg to defer as in stroke community, mild or minor stroke generally refer to patients who present with stroke symptoms with severity that accounts for NIHSS ≤5 [4]. Though referred as mild or minor stroke in terminology, around 33% of patients in this subclass suffer with poor outcomes. We suggest usage of terminology that could be easily perceived and readily implemented by the stroke community.

Various procoagulants have been used in emergent situations to reverse vitamin K antagonists related intracranial hemorrhage (VKA-ICH) including prothrombin complex concentrate, activated prothrombin complex concentrate or Factor Eight Inhibitor Bypassing Activity (FEIBA), fresh frozen plasma and recombinant Factor VIIa. VKA such as warfarin acts on both intrinsic and extrinsic clotting factors [5]. Thus, the physicians tend to favor use of procoagulants for Vitamin K antagonist related intracranial hemorrhage to replete the concentration of activated or non-activated forms of such clotting factors. However, one of their major side effects of these procoagulants include predisposition to thromboembolic events that has been a major concern in these situations. The combination of these procoagulants should be avoided in routine clinical practice. We recommend use of either procoagulants to avoid development of hypercoagulable state in these critical patients, with a preference for prothrombin complex concentrate from recent data as mentioned below. Recent advent of antidotes for non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants has opened up new horizon, though data for their utilization in reversal of Vitamin K antagonist related intracranial hemorrhage remain scarce.

As mentioned by the authors, data on the efficacy of various procoagulants for the treatment of anticoagulant related ICH remains scarce. However, recently published international normalized ratio normalization in patients with coumarin-related intracranial hemorrhages (INCH) study has demonstrated the superiority of four-factor prothrombin complex concentrate over fresh frozen plasm in respect to international normalized ratio normalization and hematoma expansion [6]. Though there was no benefit in relation to clinical outcome, the study clearly guides clinicians for rapid normalization of international normalized ratio and control of hematoma expansion in emergent situations.

Authors in their article have briefly mentioned the varying degrees of elimination for various non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants with 33% of Rivaroxaban accounting for renal excretion. We would further like to highlight over the pharmacokinetic details of this drug as ~1/3 part of the drug is excreted as active or unchanged form in the urine, while remaining ~2/3 parts of the drug is eliminated as inactive metabolites in the form of both urine and feces [7].

Use of anticoagulation in elderly patients who are prone to falls poses a therapeutic challenge in decision-making for physicians and as mentioned by the authors, and this issue needs to be discerned for each individual patient. Few previous studies have estimated that an average person needs to have approximately 300 falls per year to be disqualified from anticoagulation therapy, especially VKA [8]. Though this could be applied as a general rule to support physicians to arrive at therapeutic equipoise, however many of these cases are challenging and require supreme caution.