The Challenge of Designing Stroke Trials That Change Practice: MCID vs. Sample Size and Pragmatism
Mayank Goyal, Rosalie McDonough, Marc Fisher, Johanna Ospel
J Stroke. 2022;24(1):49-56.   Published online 2022 Jan 31     DOI:
Citations to this article as recorded by Crossref logo
Minimal Clinically Important Difference of Scales Reported in Stroke Trials: A Review
Biswamohan Mishra, Pachipala Sudheer, Ayush Agarwal, Nilima Nilima, Madakasira Vasantha Padma Srivastava, Venugopalan Y. Vishnu
Brain Sciences.2024; 14(1): 80.     CrossRef
Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Trials: Cutting, Sliding, or Keeping mRS Scores and WFNS Grades
Akshitkumar M. Mistry, Jeffrey Saver, William Mack, Hooman Kamel, Jordan Elm, Jonathan Beall
Stroke.2024; 55(3): 779.     CrossRef
Bridging the gap between statistical significance and clinical relevance: A systematic review of minimum clinically important difference (MCID) thresholds of scales reported in movement disorders research
Biswamohan Mishra, Pachipala Sudheer, Roopa Rajan, Ayush Agarwal, M V Padma Srivastava, Nilima Nilima, Venugopalan Y. Vishnu
Heliyon.2024; 10(5): e26479.     CrossRef
Clinical trials in stroke in 2022: new answers and questions
Mayank Goyal, Nishita Singh, Johanna Ospel
The Lancet Neurology.2023; 22(1): 9.     CrossRef
Minimal Clinically Important Difference (MCID) in Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for Neurological Conditions: Review of Concept and Methods
Biswamohan Mishra, Pachipala Sudheer, Ayush Agarwal, M. Vasantha Padma Srivastava, Nilima, Venugopalan Y. Vishnu
Annals of Indian Academy of Neurology.2023; 26(4): 334.     CrossRef
Clinically important effect sizes for clinical trials using infarct growth reduction as the primary outcome: a systematic review
Nien-chen Liao, Mersedeh Bahr Hosseini, Jeffrey L Saver
Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery.2023; : jnis-2023-020850.     CrossRef