J Stroke Search


J Stroke > Volume 18(2); 2016 > Article
Lee, Noh, Kang, Kim, and Kwon: Impact of Provoking Risk Factors on the Prognosis of Cerebral Venous Thrombosis in Korean Patients


Background and Purpose

Little is known about the relationships between provoking risk factors, prognosis, and optimal duration of anticoagulation in patients with cerebral venous thrombosis (CVT), especially in Asians. We aimed to investigate whether the prognosis and required duration of anticoagulation in CVT patients differ according to the provoking risk factors.


Prospectively recorded data from a tertiary medical center in South Korea were retrospectively reviewed. CVTs were categorized into three groups: unprovoked, those with possibly resolved provoking factors (PR), and those with persistent provoking factors (PP). The baseline characteristics, treatment, and prognosis of patients in these three groups were analyzed.


From 2000 to 2015, 61 patients presented with CVT: 19 (31.1%) unprovoked, 11 (18.0%) with PR, and 31 (50.9%) with PP. The patients in our cohort had a slight female predominance and lower frequency of oral contraceptive use compared to Western cohorts. Median follow-up and duration of anticoagulation were 35 and 8 months, respectively. Despite the similarities in baseline characteristics, deaths (n=3; P=0.256) and recurrences (n=7; P=0.020) were observed only in the PP group. The median intervals to death and recurrence were 9 and 13 months, respectively. Death was associated with underlying disease activity, not with CVT progression. Recurrences in the PP group were associated with lack of anticoagulation (P=0.012).


Although the prognosis of CVT is generally benign in Koreans, recurrence and death were observed in patients with persistent risk factors, suggesting their need for long-term treatment with anticoagulants.


Cerebral vein and dural sinus thrombosis (CVT) is a rare disease, which most often affects young adults [1-4]. Its prognosis is generally benign [5-9], although recurrence and death during follow-up have been observed [2]. Various risk factors for CVT have been identified [9-21], some of which may resolve during follow-up. Despite recent controversies [22,23], anticoagulant treatment is recommended to reduce morbidity and mortality [3-5,24]. As long-term anticoagulation often provokes bleeding complications, determining the optimal duration of therapy is important.
The duration of anticoagulation in CVT patients may be determined by the provoking risk factors, as is the case for venous thromboembolism [3]. Patients with a first episode of venous thromboembolism related to a reversible risk factor are strongly recommended to receive a short course of anticoagulation, while it is recommended that patients with unknown or recurrent risk factors are maintained on anticoagulation for months to years, or even indefinitely [25,26]. However, such a strategy of determining duration of anticoagulation relative to causative factors has not been firmly established in patients with CVT [27].
Lately, data from Western countries, reflected in a recent guideline, have suggested that indefinite anticoagulation may be considered in CVT patients with severe thrombophilia, defined by congenital thrombophilia; deficiencies of antithrombin, protein C or protein S; and presence of antiphospholipid antibodies [3-5]. However, whether such long-term treatment is also necessary for patients with other persistent provoking factors is unknown. In addition, the same strategy may not be directly applicable to Asian patients. The long-term prognosis of CVT has not been established in Asian patients; moreover, the risk factors may be distinct. For example, factor V Leiden and prothrombin G20210A mutations, which constitute a major proportion of severe thrombophilia, are extremely rare in Asians [28].
To provide more information on the prognosis of CVT in Asian patients, this study aimed to analyze treatment data and long-term prognosis in Korean patients with CVT classified by the presence and type of provoking risk factors. We considered that the relationships of causative risk factors and treatment status with the long-term prognosis of patients with CVT may be useful in assessing the need and duration of anticoagulation.



This study retrospectively evaluated prospectively registered, consecutive patients aged >20 years who were diagnosed with symptomatic CVT at the Department of Neurology, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea, between June 2000 and February 2015. In our center, both patients with ischemic stroke and those with intracranial hemorrhage, who are not in need of emergency neurosurgery, are usually admitted to the neurology intensive care unit or to the stroke unit located in the neurological ward, and are managed by neurologists. A diagnosis of CVT was considered when a patient complained of severe headache, seizure, or any stroke-like symptoms, with a venous sinus or cortical vein thrombosis shown on imaging work-up, often combined with parenchymal lesions of unusual vascular territories. Only patients who had this confirmed by conventional angiography, CT and/or MR venography were diagnosed with CVT and included in the analysis. Patients were followed up from diagnosis until June 2015. The study protocol was approved by the Institutional Review Board and the Ethical Standards Committee of Asan Medical Center.

Clinical and laboratory data and grouping

Clinical and laboratory data at the time of the first event were recorded, as were recurrences and deaths. Potential risk factors were those suggested by previous studies [1,9] (Table 1).
Patients suspected of having CVT underwent laboratory tests for coagulation and thrombophilia, including functional and/or antigenic assays for D-dimer, antithrombin-III, proteins C and S, anti-phospholipid antibodies, and coagulation factors; more than 85% of patients had all of these tests. C-reactive protein levels and erythrocyte sedimentation rate were also assessed. As anticoagulants may affect measurements of coagulation factors and proteins C and S, patients were diagnosed with factor VIII increase or protein C/S deficiency only when the blood samples were obtained before the initiation of anticoagulants or when the abnormalities were repeatedly observed after the discontinuation of anticoagulants. As factor V Leiden and prothrombin G20210A mutations are rare in Asians [28], genetic tests for congenital thrombophilia are not performed in our institution.
CVT provoking risk factors were classified into two categories: those provoked, resolved (PR) after the first event and those found to be provoked, persistent (PP). The patients were categorized into three groups: unprovoked, PR, and PP.

Treatment, follow-up, recurrences, and deaths

Although most CVT patients were treated initially with anticoagulants, some patients with mild symptoms, stent insertion, severe thrombocytopenia with bleeding, or successful arteriovenous fistula (AVF) embolization, were given antiplatelets or were not treated. Patients with severe sinus thrombosis underwent fibrinolysis and stent angioplasty at the discretion of the attending physicians. Patients were followed up for recurrence and death in the outpatient clinic every 3-6 months. Recurrence was defined as newly developed symptoms, accompanied by new parenchymal lesions, or progression in sinus thrombosis on imaging work-ups. Death from any cause was recorded, as were major bleeding complications (i.e., intracranial hemorrhage, hemorrhage of any cause, and a ≥3 g/dL reduction in hemoglobin concentration from baseline).

Statistical analysis

Baseline characteristics and laboratory data were compared in the unprovoked, PR, and PP groups, and in PP patients with and without recurrences. Univariate analysis was performed using Fisher’s exact test, Kruskal-Wallis one-way analysis of variance by ranks, or the Mann-Whitney U test, as appropriate. Recurrence- and death-free survival rates were calculated by the Kaplan-Meier method, and compared by the log-rank test, which tested the null hypothesis, that there was no difference in rates of recurrence and death among the three groups. A two-tailed P value <0.05 was considered statistically significant. All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS (version 21) software package.


Baseline characteristics

The study cohort included 61 patients with CVT. Their median age was 41 years, and there was a slight female predominance (55.7%). Of the patients, 45 (73.8%) underwent conventional angiography. Median follow-up and duration of anticoagulation were 35 and 8 months, respectively. Provoking risk factors were identified in 42 patients (Figure 1 and Table 1). Seventeen (27.9%) had thrombophilia with some of these patients having multiple risk factors, and only four out of 34 (11.8%) female patients had used oral contraceptives. Malignancy was identified in four patients: 2 with breast cancer, 1 with jejunal cancer, and 1 with aplastic anemia. All of those malignancies remained active throughout the study. Among the identified risk factors regarded as PR were previous history of using causative drugs, and AVF successfully treated during admission. Thus, of the 61 patients, 19 (31.1%) were classified as having unprovoked CVT, 11 (18.0%) as having PR, and 31 (50.9%) as having PP.

Comparisons of the three groups

A comparison of baseline characteristics among the three groups showed no significant differences except for duration of anticoagulation, intervention methods, and C-reactive protein (CRP) concentration (Table 2 and Supplementary Table 1). Patients in the PR group tended not to receive anticoagulants (and those who did received them for a shorter duration) and had a lower CRP level than patients in the other groups.

Recurrences and deaths

During the study period, three patients (4.9%) died, and seven patients (11.5%) experienced recurrences, all of whom were in the PP group (Figure 2); overall, thirty-seven (60.7%) patients experienced an event recurrence or dropped out. During follow-up, no patients experienced major bleeding complications, except for one patient with thrombocytopenia (patient 3 in Table 3). The median intervals from the first event to death and to recurrence were 9 and 13 months, respectively.
Of the three patients who died, two died from aggravation of the underlying disease: cancer in one patient, resulting in severe pneumonia; and aplastic anemia with thrombocytopenia in the other, resulting in massive intracranial hemorrhage. The third death was in a patient with antiphospholipid antibody who developed a sudden cardiac arrhythmia.
The rates of recurrence in the unprovoked, PR, and PP groups differed significantly (Figure 2A). A comparison of the baseline characteristics of PP patients with and without recurrence showed that use of anticoagulation was the factor that differed significantly (Table 4).

Patients with recurrences

The characteristics of each CVT patient who developed recurrences are described in Table 3. After the first event, all patients showed improvement in their symptoms at discharge, or in lesions and/or thrombosis on follow-up images (if available). Although four patients were discharged with anticoagulants after the first event, only two were receiving anticoagulation at the time of recurrence. Notably, four patients developed recurrences more than 12 months after the first event. Patient 6 with dural AVF, who failed with embolization at the initial admission due to severe collapse of sinuses, was regarded as having PP. At the second event, he underwent interventional treatment of the dural AVF again, consisting of subtotal embolization of the AVF and stent angioplasty in the transverse sinus. This time, the treatment was successful, and no recurrences were observed thereafter. Of the six other patients, five experienced no recurrences after the restart of anticoagulation. Patient 3 was exceptional, because she could not receive sufficient anticoagulation continuously during follow-up due to recurrent menorrhagia induced by thrombocytopenia. She later died after a massive intracranial hemorrhage.


In this study, we identified CVT risk factors in a Korean cohort, and evaluated the long-term prognosis of the disease according to the presence and type of provoking factors. We found that although the prognosis of CVT is generally benign in Koreans, risk factors persisting during follow-up should be considered significant for secondary prevention. These findings also suggest that patients with persistent risk factors may require long-term anticoagulation.
Among the three groups defined by risk factors, only those with PP experienced recurrences and deaths. The persistent risk factors associated with recurrence in our cohort varied, and were not limited to severe thrombophilia [4,5]. The causes of death in the three patients who died were not directly related to the aggravation of CVT, but to the activity of underlying diseases, in agreement with previous findings [9,17,22].
Appropriate anticoagulation was shown to be important, as anticoagulation was less frequent in patients with recurrences than those without. The median interval from the first event to recurrence was 13 (range: 3-71) months, suggesting that patients with persistent risk factors may require anticoagulation for several years or more. These findings are reminiscent of some previous studies arguing that anticoagulation is important in preventing recurrences in the long-term [5,18]. Of note, other research groups have reported that warfarin therapy has no effect on recurrent thrombosis or survival, although those studies did not describe the prothrombin time in patients who developed recurrence while on warfarin [22,23]. Thus, our findings provide further evidence for the importance of long-term anticoagulation in the secondary prevention of CVT in patients with persistent risk factors.
The risk factors provoking CVT in our cohort were distinct, in that the percentage of patients with a history of oral contraceptive use was relatively small compared with previous studies (54.3%-90%) [5,9,17,22]. This discrepancy may be due to the lower rate of use of oral contraceptives in East Asia (1.3%) than in Europe (21.4%) and North America (16.8%) [29]. Less frequent use of oral contraceptives, usually a transient risk factor unrelated to recurrence, may have resulted in a relatively low proportion of female patients and a high rate of recurrence (11.5%) in our patients. Thrombophilias (27.9%) were found in a rate similar to those in other studies (24.0%-38.1%), although we did not perform genetic tests to identify congenital thrombophilia. As congenital thrombophilia is very rare in Asians [28], the absence of genetic tests may have not significantly altered the risk factors identified in this population.
The PR group consisted of patients with dural AVF who were successfully treated with embolization, and those with CVT caused by drugs. Dural AVF, characterized by a shunt between the artery and sinus, can induce turbulent flow into the venous sinus that causes intimal injury leading to luminal thrombosis [18,30]. In addition, secondary CVT may amplify venous hypertension, which induces retrograde flow into the sinus [30]. Dural AVF can also develop as a late complication of CVT [4]. However, the possibility of this occurring was not likely in our cohort, since the median delay in diagnosis of CVT from symptom onset in these patients was only 6 days. Five patients were found to have causative drugs, including four with a history of oral contraceptive use and one taking cisplatin and etoposide for a pineal gland germinoma. All of these patients ceased using these agents after the first event. The patient with a history of chemotherapy was classified in the PR group, as pineal germinoma has not been associated with thrombosis, and this patient was successfully treated with radiotherapy after the discontinuation of the chemotherapeutic agents. Pregnancy and puerperium can also be transient risk factors. However, all of our patients with a history of pregnancy or puerperium also had other, persistent risk factors, classifying them in the PP group.
This study had several limitations. Firstly, because of its retrospective design, the patients did not all undergo the same laboratory tests to identify risk factors. Thus, some of the patients classified in the “unprovoked” group may have had provoking risk factors. Inasmuch as recurrences and deaths were observed only in CVT patients classified as PP, the non-identification of risk factors in unprovoked patients would likely not have altered the results of this study significantly. Secondly, we did not consider or investigate venous thromboembolism events during follow-up, despite venous thromboembolism being a more frequent complication of CVT than CVT recurrence [5]. Third, there is a chance that we did not include fulminant cases in patients who manifested with severe intracranial hemorrhage requiring emergency neurosurgery, as they would have been admitted to the department of neurosurgery directly from Emergency Room. Not including these patients may have affected the long-term prognosis of CVT, shown in this study to appear relatively benign. Fourth, this study involved patients from a single center, suggesting a potential referral bias. As CVT is a rare disease, studies of a large cohort of patients from multiple centers may provide more reliable results.


This study showed that the long-term prognosis of patients with CVT is dependent on underlying risk factors, although the natural course of this disease in Koreans is generally benign. CVT recurrence and death were observed only in patients with persistent risk factors, with some occurring more than one year after the first event whilst on inadequate anticoagulation. Thus, these patients may require long-term treatment with anticoagulants.


This study was supported by a grant of the Korea Healthcare technology R&D Project, Ministry of Health and Welfare, Republic of Korea (HI10C2020).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors have no financial conflicts of interest.

Supplementary Material

Supplementary Table 1.
Initial symptoms, affected sinuses, and the location of parenchymal lesions

Figure 1.
Identified risk factors.
Figure 2.
Recurrence and death.
Table 1.
Risk factors identified
Number of cases
Unidentified 19
 Antiphospholipid antibody 5
 Homocystinuria 2
 IgA nephropathy (nephrotic syndrome) 1
 Factor VIII increase 2
 Polycystic ovary syndrome 1
 Solid tumor (Breast cancer) 2
 Hematological 1
Hematological condition
 Polycythemia, thrombocythemia 1
 Aplastic anemia 1
 Behçet’s disease 1
 Sjögren’s disease 1
Inflammatory systemic disorder
 Ulcerative colitis 1
 Oral contraceptives/hormones 4
 Cytotoxic 1
 Dural arteriovenous fistula 7
 Antiphospholipid antibody and pregnancy 1
 Antiphospholipid antibody and spontaneous intracranial hypotension 1
 Antiphospholipid antibody and Crohn’s disease 1
 Protein C/S deficiency and pregnancy 1
 Protein C/S deficiency and iron deficiency anemia 1
 Aplastic anemia and pregnancy 1
 Rheumatoid arthritis and Behçet’s disease 1
 Factor VIII increase and iron deficiency anemia 1
 Postpartum and hypothyroidism 1
 Polycythemia vera and IgA nephropathy 1
 Crohn’s disease, Mastoiditis, and Jejunal cancer 1
Table 2.
Baseline characteristics and laboratory data
Unprovoked (n=19) Provoked, resolved (n=11) Provoked, persistent (n=31) P
Age (year) 41.0 (32.0-59.0) 50.0 (27.0-67.0) 39.0 (27.0-49.0) 0.288
Female 9 (47.4) 6 (54.5) 19 (61.3) 0.618
Diagnosis delay* (day) 7.0 (3.0-23.3) 4.5 (1.0-8.5) 9.0 (3.0-23.0) 0.270
Lesion type 0.602
 No parenchymal lesion 4 (21.1) 0 (0.0) 6 (19.4)
 Lesion without hemorrhage 5 (26.3) 3 (27.3) 9 (29.0)
 Lesion with hemorrhage 10 (52.6) 8 (72.7) 16 (51.6)
Number of affected sinuses 2.0 (1.0-2.0) 1.0 (1.0-2.0) 2.0 (1.0-2.0) 0.673
mRS at discharge 0.0 (0.0-1.0) 0.0 (0.0-3.0) 1.0 (0.0-2.0) 0.340
Initial antithrombotics 0.149
 Anticoagulation 16 (84.2) 8 (72.7) 27 (87.1)
 Antiplatelet 3 (15.8) 1 (9.1) 4 (12.9)
 None 0 (0.0) 2 (18.2) 0 (0.0)
Clinical follow-up (month)-(a) 46.0 (4.0-85.0) 25.0 (7.0-55.0) 36.0 (9.0-64.0) 0.937
Duration of anticoagulation (month)-(b) 6.5 (3.0-20.0) (n=16) 4.5 (0.0-8.0) (n=8) 10.0 (5.0-49.0) (n=27) 0.034
(b)/(a) × 100 (%) 56.0 (20.7-100.0) (n=16) 13.1 (0.0-21.0) (n=8) 100.0 (57.1-100.0) (n=27) < 0.001
Intervention 5 (26.3) 6 (54.5) 10 (32.3) 0.274
Intervention methods 0.002
 Fibrinolysis/angioplasty 5 (100.0) 1 (16.7) 9 (90.0)
 Coil-embolization 0 (0.0) 5 (83.3) 1 (10.0)
C-reactive protein (mg/dL) 0.8 (0.3-1.6) (n=18) 0.2 (0.1-0.4) (n=9) 0.5 (0.2-2.0) (n=29) 0.019
ESR (mm/hr) 14.0 (4.5-20.5) (n=16) 13.0 (6.3-32.8) (n=8) 18.0 (10.0-30.0) (n=24) 0.342
D-dimer (g/mL) 1.1 (0.6-2.3) (n=15) 1.2 (0.9-1.8) (n=5) 1.5 (0.7-2.8) (n=26) 0.711
Values are numbers (column %), median (quartiles), as appropriate. Some blood markers were not assessed in all patients.
ESR, erythrocyte sedimentation rate; mRS, modified Rankin Scale.
* Delay from the symptom-onset.
Table 3.
Characteristics of CVT Patients with Recurrence
No. Age/Sex Provoking risk factors The first event
At discharge
F/U images
Sinuses, affected Lesion, parenchymal Intervention mRS Antithrombotics Reason* Interval months Recanalization of sinuses Lesion, parenchymal
1 26/F IgA nephropathy, Polycythemia vera SSS, TS, JV No No 0 Warfarin - 15 15 -
2 42/F Factor VIII increase SSS, TS Edema and SDH Suction thrombectomy 0 Warfarin - 20 Partial Improved
3 29/F Aplastic anemia SSS Edema/infarction No 0 Triflusal N/A 11 Near complete -
4 45/F Behçet’s disease, Rheumatoid arthritis TS No Stent angioplasty 1 Aspirin, Clopidogrel Stent angioplasty N/A N/A N/A
5 40/M Behçet’s disease CV Edema with small hemorrhage No 2 Warfarin - 10 Similar Improved
6 62/M Dural AVF SSS, TS No Failed embolization 1 Aspirin N/A N/A N/A N/A
7 24/F PCOS SSS, TS Edema/infarction Failed intervention§ 2 Warfarin - N/A N/A N/A
No. The second event
At discharge
After the second event
Interval, months Antithrombotics at recurrence Reason* PT (INR) Sinuses, affected New lesion, parenchymal Intervention mRS Antithrombotics F/U months No. of recurrences
1 71 Aspirin Enough anticoagulation (for 22 months) 1.09 APT No No 0 Warfarin 13 0
2 49 Ticlopidine Transient F/U loss 0.92 APT, JV Hemorrhage Suction thrombectomy 0 Warfarin 102 0
3 13 Aspirin Thrombocytopenia 0.93 APT Hemorrhage No 0 Dabigatran 11 3
4 5 Aspirin, Clopidogrel Stent angioplasty 1.21 SmS No No 1 Aspirin, Clopidogrel 77 0
5 16 Warfarin - 3.54 CV (similar) Edema Steroid pulses 0 Warfarin 48 0
6 5 Aspirin Not specified 0.94 APT Edema Embolization, stent angioplasty 0 Aspirin, Clopidogrel 42 0
7 3 Warfarin - 2.27 APT No Failed intervention§ 2 Warfarin 0 N/A
APT, aggravated previous thrombosis; CV, cortical veins; JV, jugular vein; mRS, modified Rankin Scale; N/A, not available; PCOS, polycystic ovary syndrome, SDH, subdural hemorrhage; SmS, sigmoid sinus; SSS, superior sagittal sinus; TS, transverse sinus.
* Reason for using antiplatelet rather than anticoagulation;
Interval from the first event to imaging acquisition;
Interval from the first event to recurrence;
§ Failed to approach the sinuses with catheter due to dense and tight fibrotic stenosis and resistance of the lesion;
Inserted stent maintained, along with dual antiplatelet agents at discharge. Five months after the second event, anticoagulation with warfarin started and maintained.
Table 4.
Baseline characteristics and laboratory data according to the recurrence in patients with persistent provoking risk factors
No recurrence (n=24) Recurrence (n=7) P
Age (year) 37.5 (27.0-49.8) 40.0 (26.0-45.0) 0.982
Female 14 (58.3) 5 (71.4) 0.676
Diagnosis delay* (day) 8.0 (3.0-22.3) 15.0 (2.0-90.0) 0.502
Lesion type 0.173
 No parenchymal lesion 3 (12.5) 3 (42.9)
 Lesion without hemorrhage 7 (29.2) 2 (28.6)
 Lesion with hemorrhage 14 (58.3) 2 (28.6)
No. of affected sinuses 2.0 (1.0-2.0) 2.0 (1.0-2.0) 0.908
mRS at discharge 0.5 (0.0-2.8) 1.0 (0.0-2.0) 0.800
Anti-thrombotics at initiation 0.028
 Anticoagulation 23 (95.8) 4 (57.1)
 Antiplatelet 1 (4.2) 3 (42.9)
Anti-thrombotics at recurrence/the last observation 0.012
 Anticoagulation 19 (79.2) 2 (28.6)
 Antiplatelet 5 (20.8) 5 (71.4)
Clinical follow-up (month)-(a) 35.0 (8.3-62.8) 64.0 (24.0-84.0) 0.115
Duration of anticoagulation (month)-(b) 10.0 (6.0-49.0) (n=23) 13.5 (3.5-53.5) (n=4) 0.818
(b)/(a) × 100 (%) 100.0 (71.4-100.0) (n=23) 63.1 (8.0-100.0) (n=4) 0.448
Intervention 7 (29.2) 2 (28.6) > 0.999
C-reactive protein (mg/dL) 0.5 (0.2-1.7) 1.7 (0.6-2.7) 0.080
ESR (mm/hr) 16.0 (10.0-32.0) 24.5 (12.8-28.5) 0.626
D-dimer (g/mL) 1.5 (0.9-2.8) (n=22) 0.3 (0.2-8.5) (n=4) 0.130
Values are numbers (column %), median (quartiles), as appropriate. Some blood markers were not assessed in all patients.
aPTT, activated partial thromboplastin time; ESR, erythrocyte sedimentation rate; mRS, modified Rankin Scale.
* Delay from the symptom-onset.


1. Stam J. Thrombosis of the cerebral veins and sinuses. N Engl J Med 2005;352:1791–1798.
crossref pmid
2. Dentali F, Gianni M, Crowther MA, Ageno W. Natural history of cerebral vein thrombosis: a systematic review. Blood 2006;108:1129–1134.
crossref pmid
3. Piazza G. Cerebral venous thrombosis. Circulation 2012;125:1704–1709.
crossref pmid
4. Saposnik G, Barinagarrementeria F, Brown RD Jr., Bushnell CD, Cucchiara B, Cushman M, et al. Diagnosis and management of cerebral venous thrombosis: a statement for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke 2011;42:1158–1192.
crossref pmid
5. Martinelli I, Bucciarelli P, Passamonti SM, Battaglioli T, Previtali E, Mannucci PM. Long-term evaluation of the risk of recurrence after cerebral sinus-venous thrombosis. Circulation 2010;121:2740–2746.
crossref pmid
6. Wasay M, Bakshi R, Bobustuc G, Kojan S, Sheikh Z, Dai A, et al. Cerebral venous thrombosis: analysis of a multicenter cohort from the United States. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis 2008;17:49–54.
crossref pmid
7. Khealani BA, Wasay M, Saadah M, Sultana E, Mustafa S, Khan FS, et al. Cerebral venous thrombosis: a descriptive multicenter study of patients in Pakistan and Middle East. Stroke 2008;39:2707–2711.
crossref pmid
8. Coutinho JM, Zuurbier SM, Stam J. Declining mortality in cerebral venous thrombosis: a systematic review. Stroke 2014;45:1338–1341.
crossref pmid
9. Ferro JM, Canhao P, Stam J, Bousser MG, Barinagarrementeria F. Prognosis of cerebral vein and dural sinus thrombosis: results of the International Study on Cerebral Vein and Dural Sinus Thrombosis (ISCVT). Stroke 2004;35:664–670.
crossref pmid
10. Martinelli I, Sacchi E, Landi G, Taioli E, Duca F, Mannucci PM. High risk of cerebral-vein thrombosis in carriers of a prothrombin-gene mutation and in users of oral contraceptives. N Engl J Med 1998;338:1793–1797.
crossref pmid
11. Lanska DJ, Kryscio RJ. Risk factors for peripartum and postpartum stroke and intracranial venous thrombosis. Stroke 2000;31:1274–1282.
crossref pmid
12. Raizer JJ, DeAngelis LM. Cerebral sinus thrombosis diagnosed by MRI and MR venography in cancer patients. Neurology 2000;54:1222–1226.
crossref pmid
13. Martinelli I, Battaglioli T, Pedotti P, Cattaneo M, Mannucci PM. Hyperhomocysteinemia in cerebral vein thrombosis. Blood 2003;102:1363–1366.
crossref pmid
14. Vidailhet M, Piette JC, Wechsler B, Bousser MG, Brunet P. Cerebral venous thrombosis in systemic lupus erythematosus. Stroke 1990;21:1226–1231.
crossref pmid
15. Farah S, Al-Shubaili A, Montaser A, Hussein JM, Malaviya AN, Mukhtar M, et al. Behcet’s syndrome: a report of 41 patients with emphasis on neurological manifestations. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1998;64:382–384.
crossref pmid pmc
16. Kim MJ, Cho AH, No YJ, Kim HY, Kim JS. Recurrent Cerebral Venous Thrombosis Associated with Elevated Factor VIII. J Clin Neurol 2006;2:286–289.
crossref pmid pmc
17. Maqueda VM, Thijs V. Risk of thromboembolism after cerebral venous thrombosis. Eur J Neurol 2006;13:302–305.
crossref pmid
18. Preter M, Tzourio C, Ameri A, Bousser MG. Long-term prognosis in cerebral venous thrombosis. Follow-up of 77 patients. Stroke 1996;27:243–246.
crossref pmid
19. Breteau G, Mounier-Vehier F, Godefroy O, Gauvrit JY, Mackowiak-Cordoliani MA, Girot M, et al. Cerebral venous thrombosis 3-year clinical outcome in 55 consecutive patients. J Neurol 2003;250:29–35.
crossref pmid
20. Cakmak S, Derex L, Berruyer M, Nighoghossian N, Philippeau F, Adeleine P, et al. Cerebral venous thrombosis: clinical outcome and systematic screening of prothrombotic factors. Neurology 2003;60:1175–1178.
crossref pmid
21. Coutinho JM, Zuurbier SM, Gaartman AE, Dikstaal AA, Stam J, Middeldorp S, et al. Association Between Anemia and Cerebral Venous Thrombosis: Case-Control Study. Stroke 2015.
22. Gosk-Bierska I, Wysokinski W, Brown RD Jr., Karnicki K, Grill D, Wiste H, et al. Cerebral venous sinus thrombosis: Incidence of venous thrombosis recurrence and survival. Neurology 2006;67:814–819.
crossref pmid
23. Cundiff DK. Anticoagulants for cerebral venous thrombosis: harmful to patients? Stroke 2014;45:298–304.
crossref pmid
24. Coutinho JM, de Bruijn SF, deVeber G, Stam J. Anticoagulation for cerebral venous sinus thrombosis. Stroke 2012;43:e41–e42.
crossref pmid
25. Jaff MR, McMurtry MS, Archer SL, Cushman M, Goldenberg N, Goldhaber SZ, et al. Management of massive and submassive pulmonary embolism, iliofemoral deep vein thrombosis, and chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation 2011;123:1788–1830.
crossref pmid
26. Goldhaber SZ, Piazza G. Optimal duration of anticoagulation after venous thromboembolism. Circulation 2011;123:664–667.
crossref pmid pmc
27. Selim M. Cerebral venous thrombosis: another heparin controversy. Stroke 2014;45:8–9.
crossref pmid
28. Crowther MA, Kelton JG. Congenital thrombophilic states associated with venous thrombosis: a qualitative overview and proposed classification system. Ann Intern Med 2003;138:128–134.
crossref pmid
29. UN. World Contraceptive Use 2011. wwwunpopulationorg 2011.

30. Tsai LK, Jeng JS, Liu HM, Wang HJ, Yip PK. Intracranial dural arteriovenous fistulas with or without cerebral sinus thrombosis: analysis of 69 patients. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2004;75:1639–1641.
crossref pmid pmc


Browse all articles >

Editorial Office
Department of Neurology, Asan Medical Center,Ulsan University College of Medicine
88, Olympic-ro 43-gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul 05505, Korea
Submission, status and progress, etc ⟫ E-mail: editor@j-stroke.org
Website and system ⟫ E-mail: journal@m2community.co.kr
Publishing company ⟫ E-mail: jin@ijpnc.com
Developed in M2community
Copyright © 2018 by Korean Stroke Society. All rights reserved.
Close layer
prev next